I agree with Leandro. I mean, it seems like it's pretty simple, at least
what I want to do. Anyway, thanks for the help.
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Leandro Chescotta <
leandro.chesco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i dont think so, i never reaad the man page and i dont know to program in C
> a lot,
On Sat, 9 May 2009 19:30:12 +0200
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> My requirements are pretty simple in my opinion, but I get the
> impression they seem not to be very common ... Instead current offers
> are bloated with stuff I am only using once per year or not at all.
I have an Asus Eee 1000H a
i dont think so, i never reaad the man page and i dont know to program in C
a lot, so i think the only thing he needs are time to spare trying and
examples to try and figure it out how to do the things he want
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Hello,
* Adam [2009-05-09 11:50]:
> Hello, I am considering getting an eee pc or something similar, and am
> trying to compare prices.
I am considering buying a netbook in the very near future, too. You might
share your criteria and the results of your comparison -- I at least would
be interest
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Matthias-Christian Ott [2009-05-08 21:43]:
>> Learn C. Use man.
>
> The award for the most useless comment in this thread goes
> to... you ;)
He's going to need to do exactly that if he's going to get anywhere
with dwm. Nothing useles
* Kurt H Maier [2009-05-09 17:47]:
> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:49:53AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> > I noticed I very rarely look at most of the stuff in this status bar thoug,
> > so I am thinking of 2 staged status query -- e.g. date/time and temp in the
> > dwm status bar; The rest
`uptime` is the best combination of usefulness and simplicity in my
opinion. Then again I only use dwm on the desktop and things such as
wireless signal and battery life done apply to me.
miles
Hi,
* Matthias-Christian Ott [2009-05-08 21:43]:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:14:39PM -0400, Benjamin Conner wrote:
[...]
> > how to setup DWM. I want some autostart programs, some keyboard shortcuts,
> > and some basic stuff so I can use it. (and once I can use it, to use it well
> > :P) Can a
I have mine just clock and date, but it'll show other stats when they
are "interesting" ie high cpu usage, discharging/low battery, low/off wifi, etc
Jeremy
On Sat 09 May 2009 - 10:47AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:49:53AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> > I noticed I
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:49:53AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> I noticed I very rarely look at most of the stuff in this status bar thoug,
> so I am thinking of 2 staged status query -- e.g. date/time and temp in the
> dwm status bar; The rest can be queried 'on demand' in the console.
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 11:49:53AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> I noticed I very rarely look at most of the stuff in this status bar thou=
> g,
> so I am thinking of 2 staged status query -- e.g. date/time and temp in t=
> he
> dwm status bar; The rest can be queried 'on demand' in the co
* Jake Todd [2009-05-03 05:31]:
> What are you guys using?
I use
in .Xsession
while true ; do
xsetroot -name "`${HOME}/.status`";
sleep 4;
done &
and here is .status
cat .status |~
#!/bin/sh
Hello, I am considering getting an eee pc or something similar, and am
trying to compare prices. I currently live in germany but the only
store i have bought from here before is "bora computer" which is ok,
but I am looking for a few more data points. I am wondering if there
are some good online sh
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> From a physics standpoint if you're generating less heat you're
> consuming less power.
>
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
And you generate less heat when you allow the cpu to take advantage of
it's high frequencies at high loads, because you can put it b
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:29:50AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> From a physics standpoint if you're generating less heat you're
> consuming less power.
That's true, but I don't believe that the reduction of power consumption is
proportional to the performance losings, so the performance per watt r
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 01:56:09PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> > Personally I have noticed that locking my laptops scaling CPU to the
> > lowest frequency does give quite a noticeable improvement to the battery
> > life, around an extra hour on top of the usual 4~ hours and reduces the
> > temperature
On Sat, 9 May 2009 13:56:09 +0800
bill lam wrote:
> Thanks all for confirmation. Since I only have a desktop, no
> notebook/netbook ;-( it is somehow difficult to verify the
> improvement. I now lock the cpu frequency to 1.1GHZ (half of the
> original 2.1G).
Why on earth do you want to do this
17 matches
Mail list logo
