Re: [dwm] RESIZEHINTS broken?

2007-10-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ly an > exception... Agreed, I will change the resize code accordingly. So RESIZEHINTS will be renamed to INCRESIZE or something like that. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] RESIZEHINTS broken?

2007-10-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
> That's true. I guess it's basically like this: sizehints that don't > force the window to be larger than the space that dwm allocates for it > are ok, sizehints that do aren't. Maybe we should handle the > minimum/maximum size stuff in floating mode only. Well I

Re: [dwm] List of derived/customized/forked dwm versions

2007-10-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
_general > > What is the difference between "offsite patches" and "external repos > / forks"? > What distinguishes between "patches" and "fork"? > > (I think dwm-meillo is a patchset to dwm, not a fork.) Well it is an external repo at least ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Characters in Xterm messed up after window resize.

2007-10-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Panos P. wrote: > i'd like to test/try st. is there a repository online? > i couldn't find anything on the wiki :\ Not yet, once something gets usable there will be a wiki page. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.su

Re: [dwm] final test call

2007-10-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
might be good reasons to not extend ISTILE with || isarrange(grid). Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] final test call

2007-10-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
hat's the intention of ISTILE. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] final test call

2007-10-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, I'd like to ask you to test hg tip. If there aren't major issues, I'm going to release dwm 4.6 this weekend. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Characters in Xterm messed up after window resize.

2007-10-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
om having multible clients in the master > > area? > > It is also clumsy for me that I can't make a window fullscreen without > > leaving tilling mode. > > > > Pieter Verberne > > > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:36:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:08:14PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > Some users requested the fibonacci patch, which was only for 4.4.1. > > Even though I didn't use it, I tried to port it to 4.6, and it seems to w

Re: [dwm] resize hints logic patch

2007-10-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
inw; > - if(c->minh && h < c->minh) > + if(c->minh > 0 && h < c->minh) > h = c->minh; > - if(c->maxw && w > c->maxw) > + if(c->maxw > 0 && w > c->maxw) > w = c->maxw; > - if(c->maxh && h > c->maxh) > + if(c->maxh > 0 && h > c->maxh) > h = c->maxh; > - if(c->incw) > - w -= (w - c->basew) % c->incw; > - if(c->inch) > - h -= (h - c->baseh) % c->inch; > } > if(w <= 0 || h <= 0) > return; -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-12 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:57:19AM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > I recreated dwm.h which includes the Client struct definition yet again. > > Lemme know if you believe that other definitions might be use

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:39:12PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:49:57PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:36:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:08:14PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > > > Some

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:49:57PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:36:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:08:14PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > > > Some users requested the fibonacci patch, which was only for 4.4.1. > > > Eve

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci patch ported to 4.6

2007-10-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rence to `dwindle' > > It would be nice if someone could show me how to do this, I'm curious :) You only need to add SRC = fibonacci.c in config.mk as well. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] piped input to dwm

2007-10-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
$HOME/pipe > > "test" does not appear in the statusbar > What am I missing? echo sends end of file (EOF) after completion. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] The StumpWM Experience

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ence.ogg > > > This looks like what might be produced if dwm and ratpoison had a baby. Well, if so then the complexity in StumpWM comes from ratpoison ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] struct Client declaration

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
own in config.h. Recheck with hg tip. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] ntags initialization

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 10/10/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One question to this again. Actually I can't find any official > > reference why this should work in the C89 standard, call me > > blind or

Re: [dwm] View-previous-tags patch ported to dwm-4.5.

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
for more discussion. > > Attached please find the patch ported to dwm-4.5. > > I really think it would be very useful to have that functionality in > mainline dwm. It's extremely productive. Arg, what do you think? I applied your patch in a slightly different way (using memcpy inst

Re: [dwm] C coding question

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:32:11PM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: > 2007/10/10, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Enno Gottox Boland wrote: > > > That brings me to another style question: > > > > > > For

Re: [dwm] C coding question

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Client *snext; [...] But I agree with you in the general case. Regards, Anselm > > 2007/10/2, Juanval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 10/2/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:54:21PM +0200, Juanval wrote: > > &g

Re: [dwm] ntags initialization

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:29:30AM -0300, Brendan MacDonell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 23:33:44 CEST, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > You miss that seltags and Client->tags are both globally defined > > in the same context as the tags definition. Afaik you can't > >

Re: [dwm] View-previous-tags patch ported to dwm-4.5.

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:50:06PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:41:45PM +0200, Alpt wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:22:45PM +0200, : > > ~> I think about this proposal. > > ~> > > > > Then consider this too: &g

Re: [dwm] View-previous-tags patch ported to dwm-4.5.

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
xt; c && !isvisible(c); c = c->snext); > if(c) { > focus(c); > restack(); > } > } > > It cycles from the current to the previous window (of the focus stack). Hmm, besides the small flaw when stack == NULL, which keybindi

Re: [dwm] The StumpWM Experience

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ws succeeded then? They are much worse than Unix. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] View-previous-tags patch ported to dwm-4.5.

2007-10-10 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
;s extremely productive. Arg, what do you think? > > Vote: thumbs up. > -- > Jan Christoph Ebersbach > Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. > Eccl 12,13 -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] ntags initialization

2007-10-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:29:30AM -0300, Brendan MacDonell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 23:33:44 CEST, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > You miss that seltags and Client->tags are both globally defined > > in the same context as the tags definition. Afaik you can't > >

Re: [dwm] Console Music poll: cmus/moc/mpd

2007-10-05 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ut it? Regards, Anselm On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:21:55PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:21:25PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:06:40AM -0400, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > > > http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/cmus-

Re: [dwm] ntags initialization

2007-10-05 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
nctional scope, so I don't see how you would like to replace the allocation of seltags and Client->tags using emallocz. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Console Music poll: cmus/moc/mpd

2007-10-03 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:06:40AM -0400, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/cmus-status-display Totally offtopic, but I like your idea to have 1 2 3 4 5 q w e r as tags instead of 1 - 9. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] C coding question

2007-10-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
#x27;s just that the > K&R book (I'm re-reading it now...) doesn't seem to say anything about > this kind of things, and I couldn't think of a better group of C > coders to ask this. The alternative would be to use 'struct Client' everywhere instead of simply Client, but that is harder to read ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-10-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
oating window is raised on focus all the time which might make specific popup client windows hard to access if some fullscreen or very big window is focused (e.g. by accident). That's it already. Nothing complex in my eyes. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [patch] Rectangle Window Manager

2007-10-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rs ago... In my opinion the grid layout has only use for very rare cases (e.g. if you use a tag in a statically sense for remote terminals only to track status info). Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-10-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:57:42PM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > But this introduced another bug, when switching to floating > > layout. If a floating client has been focused in such a > > situation during e

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-10-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 12:46:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Ok I agree, the border collapsing is fine, also it wastes lesser > screen real estate! It goes upstream. Well I noticed several issues with this patch and reverted to the original behavior. First of all I added a

Re: [dwm] setmwfact bug

2007-10-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
delta; > else > mwfact = delta; // should be -= > ... > } No, that's a feature. It allows to use setmwfact for predefined values (e.g. factors for 80 col terminals). Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] bluegray

2007-10-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Fixed in hg tip's respectively. Regards, Anselm On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:37:43PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > It might be related to your screen settings. But I agree with > > set number in vim, that s

Re: [dwm] bluegray

2007-09-30 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:15:18PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:44:44PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > finally I settle with a new colorscheme, I call it bluegray > > and it is already included in dextra, dmenu and dwm will

[dwm] bluegray

2007-09-30 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
similiar on all screens. Such colors consist of 00, 33, 66, 99, cc, ff hex tuples only. http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20070930.png I switched back to terminus again for various reasons, the most important one is better UTF-8 support and a nicer 'w' character. Regards, -- Ansel

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-09-30 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:23:36PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:56:57PM +0200, Peter Hartlich wrote: > > Hi, > > > > >> What do you think about collapsing adjoining borders? > > > > > Actually I don't like it because it

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-09-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
gt; > So a window underneath another window might actually receive events > when the mouse is moved over the window on top? Eew. Can't say I've > noticed anything strange so far, though. Well I think about it, let you know later today more details. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] improved tile()

2007-09-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
kes restack() necessary and there might be nasty crossing/leave-/enternotify events because the windows actually overlap each other at the border. If aesthetic reasons matter, you could set the NORMALBORDER to the same color as you usual client background color. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><

Re: [dwm] dextra

2007-09-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
or dextra inclusion? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] new screenshot

2007-09-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
okay? Is this wanted? > ... only to be sure. It's no problem at all. > btw: > I find "my" screen-statusbar on the screenshot *yay* :-) ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] improved tile()

2007-09-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
. http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20070927.png Lemme know if you detect any issues in this new tile(). Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dwm-4.5 fails to build

2007-09-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
> > #include > > #include > > > > FreeBSD 6.11 says only regex.h is necessary. > > true > you were right > posix states: > "The type size_t shall be defined as described in ." > which seems a bit stupid to me, but standard is standard > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dextra

2007-09-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On 9/26/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > heavily based on lavish's work I put together several config > > files which should work fine with future releases of

Re: [dwm] dextra

2007-09-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:15:04PM +0200, Xavier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > heavily based on lavish's work I put together several config > > files which should work fine with future releases of

[dwm] dextra

2007-09-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
gards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-25 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:40:04PM +0200, WyrmSkull wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe wrote > >>That's exactly the proposal I had sometime ago, but it scares me > >>that it will bring unecessary complexity > Rules already have to be written manually - instead of those you >

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-25 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
sometime ago, but it scares me that it will bring unecessary complexity. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-25 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
te for a rarely used functionality. I prefer using hibernation technologies instead of restarting dwm. And once your setup settled there is no need to restart dwm anyways. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:04:54AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:50:53PM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > it won't last long that the need arises to also configure the

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:50:53PM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > it won't last long that the need arises to also configure the key > > bindings, and the terminal command, and the dmenu command, a

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:39:08PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > I'm surprised that this only adds a minor amount of lines, so I > really consider applying your patch to mainstream dwm. Are there > any complains? Yes, I thought a while about it and conclude, that when ru

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] An experiment with X resources

2007-09-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
r(SELBORDERCOLOR); > - dc.sel[ColBG] = getcolor(SELBGCOLOR); > - dc.sel[ColFG] = getcolor(SELFGCOLOR); > - initfont(FONT); > + dc.norm[ColBorder] = getcolor(getresource("normal.border", > NORMBORDERCOLOR)); > + dc.norm[ColBG] = getcolor(getresource("nor

Re: [dwm] Catching a button press outside a window

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
her and NOT doing such stuff if I were you :-) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Fixed case-insensitivity patch

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
f your patch and changed dmenu as dicussed yesterday. Because you contributed significant bits, I added you to the Copyright holders. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] spacing bewteen windows

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:56:45PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-09-23, 17:53): > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 01:10:41PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > > I have a problem with the contrary: sometimes I'd like

Re: [dwm] spacing bewteen windows

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rue > does not seem to accomplish anything. Windows are tiled properly and > sometimes I get the urxvt off-terminal garbage (as mentioned in previous > posts). > > Any HINTS? :) Yes, wait for st. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Wiki password

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
d. > > -- > James Turner > BSD Group Consulting > http://www.bsdgroup.org > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] A nice flame about C++

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/57643/focus=57918 -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] NMASTER in dwm-4.5 (was a follow up to Tuncer)

2007-09-23 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ure with each > incompatible config.h change for the people who > had problems. But wait, I thought dwm is for people > who know how to edit config.h, wasn't it :) Well ok, it wouldn't hurt much to create config.h if it is not present from config.def.h. I will update

Re: [dwm] NMASTER in dwm-4.5 (was a follow up to Tuncer)

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
I agree. > > Did you leave the isarrange(tile) in buttonpress() on purpose? I forgot this one, but fixed in hg tip. I pushed a change which introduces the ISTILE macro, which can be extended with all layout functions, which should be enabled to reuse setmwfact and zoom. Regards, -- Anselm

Re: [dwm] dmenu patches: case insensivity, common keys, emacs keys

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 09:38:10PM +0200, Michał Janeczek wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Can you elaborate on this case-insensitivy subject? Why does > > window switching require this? > > > > Maybe I'll consider this patch for mainstream dwm if you point >

Re: [dwm] Bottom stack update

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
XK_l, setmwfact, "+0.05" > }, \ > +{ MODKEY, XK_h, setmhfact, "-0.05" }, \ > +{ MODKEY, XK_l, setmhfact, "+0.05" }, \ > { MODKEY, XK_m, togglemax, NULL }, > \ > { MODKEY, XK_Return, zoom, NULL }, > \ > +{ MODKEY, XK_Return, bzoom, NULL }, \ > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_space, togglefloating, NULL }, > \ > { MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_c, killclient, NULL }, > \ > { MODKEY, XK_0, view, NULL }, > \ -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] feature request

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t there are issues in the X backend of p9p (I remember similiar issues in acme/p9p). But adding some debug info to configurerequest might enlighten us. Which version of page (p9p) do you use? Please provide me all necessary info that I can try to reproduce your issue. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu patches: case insensivity, common keys, emacs keys

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ficult to track what the code actually > does? Sorry, I disagree. The opposite of using flag-based comparisions seems more nasty. But actually first I need good reasons to accept that case-insensitive pattern matching is necessary at all (and if so, what's with ido-matching? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] NMASTER in dwm-4.5 (was a follow up to Tuncer)

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:24:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On 9/22/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > > On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Wh

Re: [dwm] NMASTER in dwm-4.5 (was a follow up to Tuncer)

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
dwm.c has isarrange(tile) checks in setmwfact(), > zoom(), and buttonpress(); don't know if would make sense to rewrite > them as !isarrange(floating). I agree. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu patches: case insensivity, common keys, emacs keys

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 09:16:51PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 06:00:13PM +0200, Michał Janeczek wrote: > > I hope these patches can make it into main tree of dmenu. The case > > insensitivity should be useful for applying dmenu to window > > sw

Re: [dwm] dmenu patches: case insensivity, common keys, emacs keys

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
mand-line manipulation shortcuts. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] I'd like to update the site soon

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 03:31:20PM +0200, Marco Squarcina wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > somehow I see the need to tune the current layout of > > suckless.org. It should provide similiar results, regardless > > which browser is

[dwm] I'd like to update the site soon

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
with the results yet. The site should be readable, use screen real estate, and colors which are easier on the eyes, even with bad screens. So opinions are welcome. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Typo in URL.

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:31:09PM +0200, James Hoving wrote: > There is a typo in the URL to the DWM source on suckless.org. > > "http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-5.tar.gz"; > Should be: > "http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.5.tar.gz"; Sorry

[dwm] NMASTER in dwm-4.5 (was a follow up to Tuncer)

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5? > > Probably not much, but I don't have time to maintain a patch. You don't need to

[dwm] dwm-4.5 / dmenu-3.3

2007-09-22 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, I created new releases which basically consist of a micromized source tree and some minor enhancements: http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm-4.5.tar.gz http://www.suckless.org/download/dmenu-3.3.tar.gz Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Announcing "awesome"

2007-09-21 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
should try out one of the dwm patches to resurrect NMASTER > > > but I always back down at the thought of having to use an external patch > > > for a long time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe industrializing the use of patches in the Makefile would not be > > such a bad idea for such patchable window manager. > > I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being. What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] here comes a better comment

2007-09-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t; Okay, the new comment isn't perfect either ... maybe something in between > should be chosen. Thanks, that comment was misleading indeed. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] All well and good . . .

2007-09-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
d see absolutely no need to write something native for windows (all windows apps I've seen so far suck like hell, so in the end I'd launch ff and a terminal possibly). To st, it is really on my plan for _this_ year. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] please test hg tip and lemme know any issues

2007-09-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:29:19AM +0200, y i y u s wrote: > 2007/9/18, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi there, > > > >I keep in mind testing the togglemax-patch, but please let me > >know any issues in hg tip. > > > > Fallback to

Re: [dwm] please test hg tip and lemme know any issues

2007-09-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
if(arg[0] == '+' || arg[0] == '-') > mwfact += delta; > + else > + mwfact = delta; > if(mwfact < 0.1) > mwfact = 0.1; > else if(mwfact > 0.9) > @@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ togglemax(const char *arg) { > } > else { > resize(sel, sel->rx, sel->ry, sel->rw, sel->rh, True); > - if (!sel->wasfloating) > + if(!sel->wasfloating) > togglefloating(NULL); > } > drawbar(); -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [patch] togglemax() on tiled windows (for dwm.c)

2007-09-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
>rw = sel->w; > sel->rh = sel->h; > resize(sel, wax, way, waw - 2 * sel->border, wah - 2 * > sel->border, True); > } > - else > + else { > resize(sel, sel->rx, sel->ry, sel->rw, sel->rh, True); > + if (!sel->wasfloating) > + togglefloating(NULL); > + } > drawbar(); > while(XCheckMaskEvent(dpy, EnterWindowMask, &ev)); > } -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] please test hg tip and lemme know any issues

2007-09-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, I keep in mind testing the togglemax-patch, but please let me know any issues in hg tip. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Updated bottom stack patch

2007-09-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:43:34PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 9/17/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > > > One question: why do you explicitly declare all dwm.c functions static > >

Re: [dwm] Updated bottom stack patch

2007-09-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:28:38PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM +0100, Chris Webb wrote: > > Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On 9/16/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Exce

Re: [dwm] [patch] togglemax() on tiled windows (for dwm.c)

2007-09-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
re carefully and decide tomorrow. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Updated bottom stack patch

2007-09-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ns static > given that you only have a single source file anyway? Yeah, that's unnecessary. I remove that - it will also consume less disk space then ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] Fwd: Auto-discard notification

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
seems like a nice idea to use a mouse button. -- Don - End forwarded message - -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Unused space between clients

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
possible, but it would make tile() more uneccessarily complex. Honestly, the real reason why I introduced the RESIZEHINTS macro is enforcing myself to continue the st development which won't suffer from those limitations all the old terminals suffer ;) Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Mouse over tile ...

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
mple way to put a temporarily moved _tiled_ window back to tiled state again. So Mod-Button2 seems natural for this. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Mouse over tile ...

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:00:43AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:36:41PM +0200, Damjan Vrencur wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Today I spent a few hours working under Xmonad window manager. Curiosity ... > > There was one feature I found quite usefu

Re: [dwm] Mouse over tile ...

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 01:29:03PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:00:43AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:36:41PM +0200, Damjan Vrencur wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Today I spent a few hours working un

Re: [dwm] Updated bottom stack patch

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
NULL }, \ { MODKEY, XK_0, view, NULL }, \ As you see, no patches necessary at all, except including that bstack.c file and to changing the zoom call with bzoom. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] I merged the whole source to one file and wanna let you know the implications

2007-09-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
k. You can declare all functions static in external layout implementations, simply because they will be part of dwm.c anyways after CPP did its job. I will do the same with dmenu as well. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] simplified config.*.h handling

2007-09-15 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
son I hesitated this change for quite a long period. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Strange problem with feh and latest tip

2007-09-15 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
d mode running feh -F .png I tried to reproduce with [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ feh -v feh version 1.3.4 Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Mouse over tile ...

2007-09-15 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
comes floating and you are free to do it. > > It feeled logical and very natural for me. Note that I'm not talking about > changing tiled porportions with mouse; here I prefer keyboard. > > What do others think about this? Sounds like an acceptable improvement ;)

Re: [dwm] [patch] Stack columns patch for dwm-4.4.1

2007-09-14 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
uld be very useful to have this on suckless.org. > > I'm happy for both of these patches to go on the contrib/patches page. > > Would anyone be interested in Xft support for the bar? It looks like it's > pretty straightforward call mapping from core text to (basic) Xft so > should be pretty trivial. > > Cheers, > > Chris. > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] arguments don't work with default dmenu command

2007-09-14 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t root.png" or whatever. For me this works without a problem. echo $SHELL `$SHELL --version` ? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >