to do it but it
worked for a friend who was looking for it's behavior.
http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-5.4-arrownav.diff
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:49:38PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
FWIW the Intel cards are the first batch to support the kernel
modesetting stuff in 2.6.29, specifically the i915 driver.
# Kurt H Maier
http://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/video
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http
openbsd, dwm, xterm, nvi, opencvs, tmux, mutt, irssi
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:30:02PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
openbsd, dwm, xterm, nvi, opencvs, tmux, mutt, irssi
How are tmux and nvi going along at your place? Here, tmux eat the
characters,
seemingly at random. mg and vim are not affected.
I've tried
:
+--+
||
+--+
||
+--+
||
+--+
Regards
Thierry
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM, James Turner ja...@bsdgroup.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:25:41AM -0500, David Neu wrote:
Hi,
I was just about to download the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.4.1 from
?
Sincerely,
--
Antony Jepson / anton...@gmail.com / GPG Key: 0xFA10ED80
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
in config.h
or manually switch to it once you start dwm (this may require an
additional line in config.h to bind the layout to a key combo).
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:28 AM, James Turner ja...@bsdgroup.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:50:22AM -0500, thierry beauquier wrote:
Hi Antony
tip
cleanly.
[0] http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-5.4-arrownav.diff
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- config.def.hSat Dec 13 12:39:14 2008
+++ config.def.hSat Dec 13 12:36:21 2008
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ static Key keys[] = {
{ MODKEY
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:34:28AM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote:
James Turner ja...@bsdgroup.org writes:
After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on
OpenBSD only #include sys/signal.h is required, no need to #include
signal.h which contains additional functions
mentioned changes, as well as this
mystery item :)
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on
OpenBSD only #include sys/signal.h is required, no need to #include
signal.h which contains additional functions.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Great! Thank you for dwm-5.3. I think that it's needed to #include
signal.h, infact without it I couldn't compile on NetBSD.
#include signal.h is also required on OpenBSD.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Epic fail on the diff, left some stuff in there that shouldn't be. Try
the new attached one.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- config.def.hTue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
+++ config.def.hTue Nov 18 19:26:53 2008
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ static Key keys
work!
Take a look at http://code.suckless.org/hg/dwm/log/e4bcaca8e6ef
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
branching by cloning, which is what I always do (apart from using MQueues).
--
Cheers,
Filippo
Thanks for the hg lesson, it was very helpful.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Hey, when I do a fresh clone of dwm, I don't see any of the changes
marked as merge in the web interface. Am I doing something wrong?
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
without your patch let me know if this fixes it. It should be
pretty much in line with the current tile now. Thanks.
[0] http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-5.1-bstack.diff
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
In the latest dmenu tip I get:
dmenu.c: In function `setup':
dmenu.c:589: warning: unused variable `n'
Since n is only used for the xinerama stuff, and I don't compile
xinerama support, what do you think about moving int n into the #if
XINERAMA check?
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http
until now. One question tho, why does bgs need to stay running after it
sets the background? If I kill it after setting the background the
image stays set just fine. I rather not have it running in the
background if it doesn't need to be. Thanks.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http
.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
unclutter [0].
[0] http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/X11/contrib/utilities/unclutter-8.tar.gz
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:35:13PM -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
James,
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, James Turner wrote:
You might want to check out unclutter [0].
[0] http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/X11/contrib/utilities/unclutter-8.tar.gz
Many thanks That seems to be exactly what I was looking
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:53:36AM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried to run st on OpenBSD? OpenBSD doesn't support the
posix_openpt functions, I was wondering if anyone has tried to implement
openpty(3) instead?
For the new
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 6/14/08, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't it make more sense to do a test, then just redirect error
output?
Then you'd have to test more than your patch does: right now, your
patch only tests if we're dealing
, but on my current machine I don't have that directory created.
Attached is a simple tweak to dmenu_path to test if the directory
exists. Thanks.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- dmenu_path Sat Jun 14 15:24:14 2008
+++ dmenu_path Sat Jun 14 15:25:27 2008
@@ -14,6
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:06:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:48:09PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
Is the lt-arrange behavior in setmfact going to get changed before 5.0
is released so we don't need to basically recreate the function in our
layout patches?
Yes
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:16:24PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:06:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 07:48:09PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
Is the lt-arrange behavior in setmfact going to get changed before 5.0
is released so we don't need
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:20:59PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
I think it should be if(!d || !lt-arrange) not if(!d || lt-arrange)?
Oh, what a disaster! Sorry for the inconvenience! Fixed in hg
tip.
Kind regards
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:08:54AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 5/26/08, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.0. From what I can tell
domwfact is no longer present so I had
switch
to running it full time, so expect the patch for it and hopefully future
releases to stay up to date.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:08:54AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 5/26/08, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated the bottom stack patch for dwm-5.0. From what I can tell
domwfact is no longer present so I had
:33 PM, James Turner wrote:
Hi all,
Although I don't have more than one monitor, I've added xinerama
support to the bottom stack patch. Again, I worked off of the built
in tile layout. Those of you with multiple monitors please feel
free to give the patch a go and let me know if you run
the statusbar updates all together and see if that
might be the cause.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Fixed some layout bugs from 4.6 and 4.7. Should perform even better
with resizehints.
http://bsdgroup.org/files/dwm-4.7-bstack.diff
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- bstack.cWed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
+++ bstack.cFri Nov 2 19:22:07 2007
@@ -0,0 +1,39
and dmenu.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:43:02PM +0200, Pieter Verberne wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:39:19PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Hi there,
I'm glad to announce new releases:
http://www.suckless.org/download/dwm
Sorry about breaking the thread, I suck at keeping email. Anyways, it
was an issue with pcc, for those interested, a patch can be found at
http://marc.info/?l=pcc-listm=119263171313410w=2. dwm now compiles
perfect without any warnings using pcc.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http
: implicit conversion of argument 1 due to \
prototype
dwm.c, line 1696: warning: implicit conversion of argument 1 due to \
prototype
dwm.c, line 1707: warning: implicit conversion of argument 1 due to \
prototype
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:28:12PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 10/16/07, James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dwm.c, line 362: warning: implicit conversion of argument 1 due to \
prototype
looking into pcc src it is highly probable to be a compiler defect
(after typechecking
I'm trying to update the bottom stack patch wiki entry but can't seem to
find the password on the list anywhere. If anyone would be willing to
email me it off list it would be greatly appreciated.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Attached is an updated patch for the bottom stack layout. The setmhfact
and bzoom functions can be removed once the normal setmwfact and zoom
function are updated to use isarrange(floating) mentioned in a previous
email. Let me know of any issues.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http
to either isarrange(tile) or
isarrange(bstack) each time. Thanks.
ps. Anyone have a good book for a beginner learning c?
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
the code is still being changed. I think before 4.4 was
released I probably rewrote my patch at least a dozen times to work with
the changing source tree. This of course will eliminate that need all
together.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
this echo `/usr/sbin/apm -l`%. If all
you want is
the remaining percentage it does the trick nicely.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
I've updated the bottom stack patch to work with the new micromizied
version of dwm. It includes my previous main patch as well, so if your
operating system doesn't support strlcpy you will need to remove that
part from the patch. Let me know if you experience any issues.
--
James Turner
BSD
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 06:24:35PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
I've updated the bottom stack patch to work with the new micromizied
version of dwm. It includes my previous main patch as well, so if your
operating system doesn't support strlcpy you will need to remove that
part from the patch
ported the
bstack portrait layout since thats all I use. Enjoy, and feel free to
post any issues.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- config.default.hTue Aug 21 18:09:46 2007
+++ config.default.hTue Aug 21 18:10:27 2007
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static Layout layouts
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:53:46PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 08:09:54PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
Well the zoom function seems to work, but increasing the master area
does not. I changed part of the incmaster function within tile.c to
if(lt-arrange
bstack.c? Also any suggestions ore always
welcome.
Patch here: http://calminferno.net/files/dwm-4.4-bstack.diff and
attached.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- bstack.cWed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
+++ bstack.cSat Aug 11 14:40:27 2007
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/* See
Turner wrote:
Quick note just in case, use patch -p0 dwm-4.4-bstack.diff within
the dwm source dir to apply.
On Aug 11, 2007, at 6:53 PM, James Turner wrote:
I've gone ahead and updated the bottom stack patch to work with
the new
4.4 tip. I just ported the portrait layout since that's
as a login shell and then execute vim within it, which
should provide you with syntax hilighting.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
configuration. Good luck.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
in
the wiki.
--
James Turner
Here are the links again, if they didn't come through.
http://calminferno.net/files/dwm-4.2-bstack.diff
http://calminferno.net/files/dwm-4.2-main.diff
On Jul 15, 2007, at 7:47 PM, James Turner wrote:
You can also find the bottom stack patch here: http://
calminferno.net/files/dwm-4.2
a display manager like gdm, but my xsession does shutdown cleanly as it
should when I a-shift-q to quit dwm.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Attached is a patch to add the bottomstack layouts to a clean 4.2 install.
I also changed somethings in the portrait layout in order to remove the
gap between the master and other windows.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
--- layout.cWed May 30 06:20:42 2007
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 07:44:18PM +0200, Anydot wrote:
On (16/06/07 10:26), James Turner wrote:
Attached is a patch to add the bottomstack layouts to a clean 4.2 install.
I also changed somethings in the portrait layout in order to remove the
gap between the master and other windows
Does anybody know if there is an updated patch for bottomstack? It
fails it two places while patching. Thanks.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:06:44AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
Can you tell at which places it fail ?
I just recently *manually* patched it. Maybe I can assist.
James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anybody know if there is an updated patch for bottomstack? It
fails it two
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:50:45AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:06:44AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
Can you tell at which places it fail ?
I just recently *manually* patched it. Maybe I can assist.
Does anybody know
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:50:45AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:06:44AM +0200, Engin Tola wrote:
Can you tell at which places it fail ?
I just recently *manually* patched it. Maybe I can assist.
Does anybody know
if there is away to kill sleep as soon as I quit dwm? Thanks for the
help as I imagine it's not dwm specific.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Anydot wrote:
On (06/06/07 17:03), James Turner wrote:
As you can see I have the echo command sleep for 60 seconds. I was
using 1 second, but found my load nearly doubles. My problem is when I
run Alt + Shift + q to quit dwm I find X hangs
and the xsession exits like I
would expect!
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
64 matches
Mail list logo
