setting up my
screens, this patch is the first i found to serve a working xinerama
environment. And it feels great.
Even though i don't like dwm's strict 2-column design, this patch
shows a lot of potential, very well done!
--
hiro
What do you people do so that others won't just ctrl-alt-backspace
back to the open console session?
can use the whole capabilities of Xinerama. Here
you are, Nicolas.
hiro
I consider different tagsets for each screen, which can't be
selected in a join way, to prevent the basic problem of being
unable to display the same window on different screens.
It doesn't really fix that problem, but limits the user to make it
seem more logically.
And specially if one of
of a religion here. The differences are
quite small, and the only really simple solution is not changing
everything. You shouldn't just believe!
I vote for thoughtfulness.
--
hiro
I'm using xmonad now, because hg tip isn't usable with Xinerama yet.
And their model is what i wanted, except window swapping
among different
views (screens) might need mouse assistance in some cases, so
I'm aware of this already.
http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-xinerama-new.png
Kind regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
--
hiro
2log
Description: Binary data
(yes it was painful), it's not
possible anymore.
I really hope this is gonna change :(
Regards,
--
Nicolas Martyanoff
http://codemore.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try xmonad, it's usable for the things i'm doing
--
hiro
The web is full of visual bloat. That's why your web browser must be
compatible, thus be bloat, too.
Vimperator is no big win. If you want a better web, provide mountable
interfaces to the important services...
And regarding firefox: I tried to print ten pages from firefox
yesterday. It slowly
Well, thanks for pointing that out, then.
I'm happy you don't want it.
On 3/8/08, Antoni Grzymala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hiro dixit (2008-03-08, 09:30):
this is not this unix convention's purpose.
I don't see any use of that feature in dmenu. You could always write a
wrapper around
is not made for xinerama. But it used
to be on the todo list...
--
hiro
You wouldn't need all these different ones if you had my I suck shirt.
--
hiro
it would be hilariously great.
i've tried it, but never saw the point of this not-so-revolutionary concept.
I am still eager to sea a really acme-like *interface* additionally to
only it's layout. But i assume this is not your ambition.
you don't like mailing lists? I can't see the use of a forum...
--
hiro
how about a web interface to a mailing list? you could tell them to
get a google account...
Polls are stupid.
All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rather a
matter of popularity, not sanity.
Dwm got off course and needs some clear objectives again!
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
development process. Shame on me!
At the beginning dwm was Anselm's baby, and he said it shall only fit
his needs. He made this very clear and I
very often
(usually every four years).
[Just by the way.]
The results of the polls are still bad, that's also no real point.
It works usually that way on the mailing list, doesn't it?
-9e99
I don't think so. It's still a discussion you want.
--
hiro
Come on it's enough now. Do you remember how this pointless discussion
started:
| Polls are stupid.
I just wanted to involve the users a bit on this issue. And in fact this
statement is stupid and not polls.
Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain framework
of
btw. what naming convention do bx, by, bw,wx,... follow?
Why don't you just use the beerware license? It's really easy to
understand. And you will get a lot more out of it.
use single GPL licensed software, use Linux and secure your digital freedom!
You think this is freedom?
it's so easy guys.
freedom is when you don't mind looking into LICENSE.
Ever heard of pipi langstrumpf?
She's not public domain. :P
SHE is public domain. And you can probably get all her stuff from bittorrent.
Some people here better give this a try. This is more benefit than
reading stupid LICENSEs
to be free, but the code
doesn't mind. It is just letters and stuff. neither free nor unfree.
Leave it simple!
--
hiro
On 5/20/08, Kurt H Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this
user does not have
On 5/20/08, Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hu? There is another license as secure than the GPL to protect against
code closing?
You mix everything up. There is no need for protection of open code.
Well many
is, you can offer an unlimited amount of software apps
in closed source and it will not hinder anyone in doing what he'd like
to do. Even if they are all copys of the same public domain code...
--
hiro
funny. This is plain ridiculous
--
hiro
That's our freedom (in your definition). Szabolcs and I can use terms in
another way than you, you hiro can curse on public mailing lists, and I
can decide to stop discussing with people who swear and get personal.
This is not politics, it's the internet, boy. Though you could nee
some
cangratiolations, you have reached the next level.
Thanks, that's interesting.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/5 Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
What do people think about such an EEE PC as low budget option to run
dwm on? Any experiences already if the screen is big enough for daily
work? I
I think andrew's point is about dwm's very own style.
You can, though, use dwm without any problems out of the box, and thus
I don't fully agree with him.
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
regards, y0shi
Could be, that X doesn't
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:42:32PM +0100, hiro wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very
Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously
absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue.
I don't understand a word, sorry.
And yeah, I understand what simplicity is about...
how about that?
On 2/10/09, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
[2009-02-10 06:51] Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
Please mark mailing-list etiquette posts as off-topic, so my mail
client and filter them appropriately. Thanks.
Can you please tell me how to do so.
I know people who
yeah thank you too. Next time I will include the [sarcasm] tag for you...
On 2/10/09, Enno Gottox Boland got...@gmail.com wrote:
don't introduce totally senseless rules noone respects.
btw stfu. :)
thanks.
Gottox
2009/2/10, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com:
how about that?
On 2/10/09
Well, you should use flash, it looks the same on all browsers.
My favourite HTML tag is pre.
You will need great luck.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org wrote:
Hi,
since several years I have been planed to launch a personal website. I
used to do quite
I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
with something new. I'd be very interested in contributing. I think
the replacement should not only focus on presentation but equally on
forming a base for less suckish applications which are highly network
transparent.
Kind
On 3/11/09, twfb twf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 00:59 Wed 11 Mar , Uriel wrote:
Also, www.suckless.org is *SLOW* to the point of being unusable
Slight exaggeration perhaps... but it is a little bit slow and was
indeed slow even before the switch to werc. Nothing dramatic but
noticable
8. music - turntables and mpd/sonata
Do you have multiple instances of mpd and control them with your turntables?
but there is a very good (and suckless!) digital vinyl emulation software
for Unix: http://www.xwax.co.uk/
Thanks. So far I've been playing only with analog vinyl and this
evercrashing windows stuff;)
I found some other comments, which sound really promising, so I think
I will give this a try:
Me neither.
Here with opera I see that it will only be fast if it has already
resolved the host name. After clearing the cache every single
subdomain of suckless.org takes several seconds to load up at the
first time, whereas cat-v.org will always show up instantly.
I have no idea how to debug
hm probably (c) would be better there (and in the license)
utf-8 is great *especially* in the license:)
Discuss this on the autoconf mailinglist, please...
We're all users and thus don't want to waste our time on this stuff from hell.
Thanks, that sounds great!
Now we only need a working flash replacement:(
But I'm eager to try this out at home this evening.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Just to notify community:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1
Web kit minimal browser,
But here is the URL to wikipedia if you prefer that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)
He probably means this page: http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cbook/
But I guess his point was that you should have provided that standard
information (copied from above web page):
The C
+0200
hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
Forums are a disease, but they are successful, because people are
always glad about the neat, animated smiley's, there are proudly
occupied moderators, and a lot of cool features for the administrator
to play with. Mathml support, flash games and reading
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
From a physics standpoint if you're generating less heat you're
consuming less power.
# Kurt H Maier
And you generate less heat when you allow the cpu to take advantage of
it's high frequencies at high loads, because
53 matches
Mail list logo