[2009-05-20 08:35] Uriel
>
> I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
> lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
> single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
> 'offtopic' discussion.
+1
> Right now when one has some
[ pretty off topic ]
Three days off-line and now ... *eek* ... 75 new messages.
It was interesting to read all those opinions and comments. I think it
was even fun, because I'm not directly affected ... not anymore. I
already found what I was looking for, more than a year ago. dwm then
was alrea
[2009-04-25 19:47] Matthias-Christian Ott
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 07:18:45PM +0200, pmarin wrote:
> >
> > Low power computers...Why not a netbook?
>
> Because netbooks and laptops aren't ergonomic.
Plug external input and output devices to them. ;-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digit
[2009-04-20 16:29] Antoni Grzymala
> Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-04-20, 15:07):
>
> > ifconfig and dhclient?
>
> Those two don't really deal with the wireless layer of 802.11 (though
> ifconfig does in some OS'es to an extent).
He probably meant: iwconfig and dhclient
^
... as
[2009-04-18 12:46] Anselm R Garbe
> 2009/4/18 Jan Blazek
> > Scytrin dai Kinthra wrote:
> >> I use a combination of xss and xkeygrab to lock my screen but allow
> >> the UI to update in the background so I can see incoming emails and
> >> chats.
> >
> > This is something I always wanted but didn'
[2009-03-12 10:14] Stefan Kuttler
>
> Texteditor = ed
You really do all your editing with `ed'?
If so, then I have great respect!
Modifying small files like `.hgignore' with `ed' is no problem, but I
could not manage to be efficient and productive when working in larger
files like `dwm.c'
[2009-03-11 16:10] yy
> 2009/3/11 markus schnalke :
> >
> > /mm/dd is not worst but still worse than -mm-dd.
> >
> > The latter one is a standard, and it is usable in filenames.
> >
> > Think about it.
>
> I'm thinking about it, but rea
[2009-03-11 12:47] Uriel
>
> Well, that should be corrected when the frontpage is converted to a
> proper werc feed,
That might be right. I don't know about the internals ... I only made
a suggestion from the user's POV.
> that looks like this: http://ninetimes.cat-v.org/
I think you should i
[2009-03-10 22:57] Kurt H Maier
>
> He's probably talking about the front page, screenshot here:
> http://bayimg.com/image/caombaabd.jpg
correct.
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I suggest to change the date format (on the entry page) into
-mm-dd. The current format is confusing because you never know if
it is dd/mm/ or mm/dd/. To solve this problem and to provide a
sane date format that works well with ``computer logic'', the ISO 8601
was created.
Please consi
rgc == 2) && (strcmp("--version", argv[1]) == 0)) {
/* version information */
fprintf(stderr, "redscr-%s, (c) 2006-2007 Anselm R. Garbe, 2007 markus schnalke\n", VERSION);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
if ((argc == 2)) {
/* set color */
/* printf("arg: %s",
[2009-02-19 08:51] Szabolcs Nagy
>
> don't try to fix the browser, you can't
> it leads to a chaos where each website has different versions for each
> browser, display media, resolution,..
>
> there is no way to do "nice in all browsers" page (or pixel correct
> presentation)
I agree here. If
[2009-02-18 22:31] Anselm R Garbe
> 2009/2/18 Matthias-Christian Ott :
>
> I think the only way is dropping HTML and CSS altogether and going
> with something new.
It's still good enough ... so it is likely to stay for many more
years. :-(
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2009-02-14 14:02] Yoshi Rokuko
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:24:04AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > http://www.marmaro.de/docs/suckless-lightningtalk_64k.mp3 (6.5m)
>
> hat mir gefallen - nice talk.
thanks
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2008-08-26 09:35] markus schnalke
>
> two weeks ago I was at the CCC-Stuttgart LightningTalk event and did
> a presentation about suckless.org and dwm.
>
> You find the (English) slides on:
> http://marmaro.de/docs
>
> The deep link is:
> http://marmaro.de/D
[2009-02-10 06:51] Kurt H Maier
>
> Please mark mailing-list etiquette posts as off-topic, so my mail
> client and filter them appropriately. Thanks.
Can you please tell me how to do so.
I know people who use ... . Do you mean that?
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2009-02-03 22:33] Marcin Cieslak
>
> I don't like this approach. I have always preferred software that "fails
> fast". As soon as something is wrong - just abort with debugging information
> what went wrong.
>
> I see some issues with the approach described in the paper. It assumes that
> the sta
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> >> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
> >
> > what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
>
> Co
[2009-01-14 13:36] Neale Pickett
>
> But if you're enamoured of the idea, here's something you can do from
> your .xinitrc to get this behavior. This will work better with dwm 5.4
> than with a prior version.
>
> while ! dwm; do true; done
That was not what I intended with my post. I alrea
Hoi,
have you ever heard of crash-only software?
Might this be a concept to improve dwm? Is it possible at all, to make
dwm a crash-only software?
This is just a thought, because I stumpled upon the concept and think
it's a quite interesting approach.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crash-onl
[2009-01-10 14:10] Matthias-Christian Ott
> Christian Garbs wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 06:05:35PM -0500, voltaic wrote:
> >
> > (this might conflict with
> > highlighting windows, don't know as I don't use it).
>
> No, it doesn't conflict with highlighting, because you could highlight
> t
[2009-01-09 22:35] bill lam
>
> I need to compile each time I add anthor gui program. Is there any
> way to automatically float all gui program?
Make floating the default and add rules for your terminal emulators.
... however, pancake hit the point :-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Dig
[2009-01-08 18:05] voltaic
>
> I agree with Matthias. The purpose of a border is to separate one
> client from another.
My view is: the (highlighted) border is to indicate the active client.
(Normal borders are only placeholders for the highlighted border.)
meillo
signature.asc
Description:
[2008-12-28 13:01] Szabolcs Nagy
> On 12/14/08, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > I plan a lightning talk on the 28/12 in the morning about st and the
> > secret project...
>
> sooo.. what is the secret project? ;)
> or is the talk scheduled later?
> what's happened?
please also link the recording and
[2008-12-27 11:48] Ian Daniher
>
> What's wrong with midnight commander? It's an oldy but a goody. Two pane
> file interface, has a boatload of features. Is it the "bloat" of these other
> features that you're trying to avoid?
This too, but worst is its usability. The keystrokes are a real mess.
[2008-11-04 15:15] Donald Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:20 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
>
> >btw: call me `meillo` :-)
>
> You got it, meillo: command not found! :)
*lol*
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2008-11-04 17:11] Premysl Hruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi, I've added you script (with markus schnalke's generalization) to the
> wmu's repo. thx.
thanks.
btw: call me `meillo` :-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2008-11-04 11:04] [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Lets say kopete_events.sh:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> /usr/bin/wmu 1 `/usr/bin/xwininfo -int -name "Kopete"|egrep "Window\ id:"|cut
> -d' ' -f4`
More general:
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# -ne 1 ] ; then
echo "usage: $0 ";
exit 1;
fi
/usr
[2008-09-07 21:24] Filippo Erik Negroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Code that sucks less is code that compiles for many years to come, and
> strives for maximum portability, within reason.
... or is it code that's easy to understand and therefor easy to
maintain?
Pike and Kernighan call it:
simpl
[2008-08-26 21:01] markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I currently read a (free available) book about `MH' and `nmh'. I will
> post a link tomorrow.
I already found the bookmark on this computer:
http://rand-mh.sourceforge.net/book/
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2008-08-26 18:11] pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have been thinking these days on writing something suckless for
> managing my mail. I don't know if any of you is happy with any mail
> client, but I do not feel comfortable with any of them.
you're not the only one ;-)
> This is why I am thi
[2008-08-26 14:31] Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I would be pleased if you could add dwm-gtx to dwms children.
I understand your wish, but I havent heard of someone (else than you)
using it.
There are lots of branches/forks/patchsets/children of dwm, but in my
eyes, only `xmonad' an
[2008-08-26 12:57] Anselm R Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You don't intend to upgrade your branch to a more recent dwm version?
I don't need all the new features ;-P
As I told you (some time ago), I stripped everything I don't need from
the source. That lead to a even more simple code base, whic
Hoi community,
two weeks ago I was at the CCC-Stuttgart LightningTalk event and did
a presentation about suckless.org and dwm.
You find the (English) slides on:
http://marmaro.de/docs
The deep link is:
http://marmaro.de/Documents/suckless_print.pdf
We also had audio recording. (I talked in
[2008-08-19 16:31] pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I sent a mail few time ago about the gallery system I wrote in a boring
> night for managing my pictures, and now I come back with some new ideas
> and stuff...
> In the current version i have just replaced the imagemagick dependency
> in pro to use
Hoi,
just if you didn't already know:
The repo (public wiki) is not pushable with Mercurial version 0.9.1
which is in Debian etch.
I installed the backport (v1.0.1), and it worked fine then.
Finally I noted that as a bug in the page about the wiki.
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
[2008-07-31 16:41] pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'll try to add some more precisse descriptions on the points :)
and please use more easy words and less irony
That makes the document clearer and so more useful.
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:14 +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > >
> > > Mixed ta
[2008-07-29 10:22] Bill Puschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Oh, and relax about the flamewar. Elitists love that sort of thing.
So, I'm not an elitist!
... but I'll continue using dwm though.
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[2008-07-29 14:21] Anselm R Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I believe I need to make some releases very soon, to stop this thread ;)
I'm sorry it became a flamewar, that was not intended :-(
It's sad to read some of the things I read in this thread. It's sad,
but it's how it is.
Seems like the p
[2008-07-29 11:35] Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 7/29/08, Anselm R Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/7/29 markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>"This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking
> >> stupid
&g
[2008-07-29 09:44] Anselm R Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2008/7/29 markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >"This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid
> >questions."
>
> Well, I removed this statement, now. It was
Hoi community,
the website ( http://www.suckless.org/dwm ) contains the following
words:
"This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid
questions."
Please discuss about removing, or altering that.
The reason is, that I met people who thought, that the dwm-/s
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We moved
> from mailman to mlmmj.
I used `mlmmj' for quite some time, but switched now to `minimalist'
which I like much more.
Maybe you wanna have a look at it.
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:42:24AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > but then you probably have to wait one minute when you want to
> > shutdown (Alt-q) dwm.
> >
> > (At least it was like this in earlier relea
Jason Thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> while true
> do
> echo `date "+%m/%d %H%M"`
> sleep 60
> done | dwm
>
>
> (you only need to pole date once a minute for as accurate as you are
> getting)
but then you probably have to wait one minute when you want to
shutdown (Alt-q) dwm.
(At leas
Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> here is a time vs sloc plot (instead of revision vs sloc)
I like that one.
Maybe we should have x-axis descriptions for time, revision and
releases ... but maybe thats overkill then ;-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hoi community,
I updated my dwm-sloccount-graph creating script.
First, it was not possible to run it on another machine with
mercurial-1.0, which has no 'strip' command :-?
However, I used `update -r -C' instead, which seems to be better
anyway.
Second, I added display of the dwm release numbe
Charlie Kester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd also vote for the red one. It's a classic.
I ordered the red one now.
> But there are more up-to-date books on compilers, and there might
> be more easily digested introductions. It's hard to give good
> advice without knowing more about your
Hoi Community,
I want to buy a book about compilers and heard of the "Dragon Books"
which should be the right choice.
Because I dont want to afford more than one, I have to choose:
- Principles of Compiler Design (1977, the "Green Dragon Book"), by
Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman
- Compile
Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/14/08, markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> gd is _not_ a small lib
but even tough much smaller than ImageMagick.
> also gd only does very simple resampling (!= image resize)
I'm not an expert, but gd pr
David Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't say what kind of resizing you're doing and the constraints:
> are you doing something like a generating thumbnails on-line so the
> quality constraints aren't that high but you want it to be fast, or
> trying to blow up images to fit the screen
Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/13/08, markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I feel the need for a image resize program that matches the
> > Unix and suckless philosophy.
>
> image resize is a non-trivial task
> (there are
Hoi community,
I feel the need for a image resize program that matches the
Unix and suckless philosophy.
Currently I'm using ImageMagick, which is just fine, if it is already
installed. But I was shocked, when I had to install it on a clean
system: I has that many dependencies!
The only thing I wa
Ross Mohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. What debugger do you use for C programming?
>
> 2. What debugger do you use for Curses C programming?
printf()
:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Premysl Hruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is realization of Gottox's proposal discuted on IRC today.
> It handles tags not as Bool [], but as bit-array saved in int.
I read, that bit-arrays are not very portable between different
architectures. (It was in "The practice of programming", I
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe that things will settle with 5.0, because I already
> focus more on st.
was waiting for that to come true for quite a long time. :-)
meillo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Daniel Bainton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/12 Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I agree, but still the SLOC is a related indicator if the
> > functionality has been implemented in a decent way at its level.
> > If a file editor (vim) consists of >200.000 SLOC, something is
> > wr
Nearly one year ago, anydot posted a graph of how dwm sloc changed
since the beginning. The initial post:
http://www.suckless.org/pipermail/dwm/2007-May/002580.html
I was curious about how it went on since then and created a new graph.
You find it here:
http://prog.marmaro.de/dwm-meillo/dwm-slocco
Martin Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:43:05PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > markus schnalke dixit (2008-04-24, 08:37):
> > > Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Martin Sander dixit (2008-04-24, 01:27):
&
Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Sander dixit (2008-04-24, 01:27):
>
> Which, in my case, is mapped to the control-key
so you're probably an emacs user ;-9
vi friends would map escape to caps lock instead
... however, you'll increase your working speed
(if you dont work on for
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though,
> I'm not totally sure if the sort -u breaks anything with wmii.
> This needs to be tested first.
What is the problem with `sort | uniq'.
Okay, it may be a bit slower, but beside that ...?
If it is more portable than `sort -u', so why don't use
Hoi dwm lovers,
long time I stayed on version 4.4.1 without having problems, but today
I updated dwm-meillo to the current tip (rev1163).
The patch is much smaller now, mainly because monocle is mainstream
and I managed toggleview in an easier way.
You find the patch and my config.h on:
http
David Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:50 AM, markus schnalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > sounds interesting!
> > Would you make the modified source (or a patch) available, please.
>
> Here's a patch against aterm-1.0.0 obtainable from [...]
thx
meillo
Ralph E. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When only one client is in a workspace (or tagset, or "view"),
> it could be borderless.
>
> In the default geom, or in bottomstack, the border is unnecessary.
> In my favorite monocle, any border would remind that something is
> below.
No.
The bo
David Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One thing I did was modified aterm so that it changes the background
> colour based upon using a very simple hash of the directory name as an
> index into a colour table. After about a year I now know automatically
> which colour various very common direc
Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > resize(c, mox - c->border, moy - c->border, mow, moh, RESIZEHINTS);
> >
> > No, then x and y might be negative.
>
> and why is that a problem?
> (i like borderless monocle..)
The border is usef
Hoi community,
I remember a time (probably between version 4.1 or 4.4 or so), when
the development of dwm became more and more stable. dwm began to reach
a point near "finished" (or "perfect"). Changes became smaller, and
mostly it was optimizing the existent features and simplyfing.
With the mul
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> monocle will be in mainstream dwm tonight.
Wee, yeah!
*SCNR*
meillo
Ritesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I too like the idea of abstracting the Xinerama code away from the main dwm
> codebase.
Good decition in my eyes!
meillo
I think the problem is not interesting anymore, but I want to share
some ideas though.
Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, a potential problem I see already is the desktop being covered by all
> the tiled windows that they'd want to open. One window open, desktop is
> gone.
You cou
Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> definitely don't believe in configuring a window manager by
> editing the source code. at the very least, this seems to imply
> that one starts over and over again with each new release (or
> one has to verify that the config header default layout
Sylvain Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the
> > > X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls.
> >
> > This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the different
> > ways to communicate with
Taras Ivashchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> apt-cache search osd | grep xosd-bin
why not use `apt-cache show xosd-bin' instead :-)
meillo
Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use for displaying a block segment of code. Markdown.pl uses
> . I really don't know if I should use that too.
I read, that it should be , because of the semantic behind
it. just stands for preformated text, normally does not
change anything
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I consider monocle going mainstream instead of the more or
> less crappy maximize() and previous togglemax(), any concerns?
Fine, so I dont need a patch for this anymore.
meillo
Jukka Salmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Use the `command' utility (which is a builtin in all bourne-compatible
> shells I've seen so far) with its -v or -V option. This is the way to
> go "on systems supporting the User Portability Utilities option"
> according to SUSv3.
>
> SUSv3 also mention
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Both, type(1) and which(1) are not POSIX compliant and might be absent.
> Though I'd use which(1) if you don't want to go the way used by
> dmenu_path for instance.
Thanks to you and the others who answered.
I will use `which' now.
meillo
Rickard Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a pretty nasty solution if you ask me. I would have used:
> if [ ! -f `which convert` ]
okay, thanks for that (and the '|| exit' in the other mail), but
that's just cosmetic.
The main question is:
Use `which' or `type' or what else?
Hoi community,
I have a question that is a bit off topic, but I think you are the
right ones to ask.
I'm writing some shell scripts these days, and a common task is to
check if a particular program is installed (for example `convert').
How is this check done in a sane and portable way?
The tw
Robert Figura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just put my current work in progress version online:
> http://spuerwerk.dyndns.org/~rfigura/dwm/
> Your comments are welcome.
Screenshots desired! :-)
meillo
Think it would be nice to see dwm handling some utf8 characters in the
status line.
A user-based screenshot gallery wouldn't be bad either. To show the
different looks dwm can have.
Maybe just another wiki page?
meillo
Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/10/19, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why not keep this list in the suckless wiki?
> Done. http://www.suckless.org/wiki/dwm/patches/0_general
What is the difference between "offsite patches" and "external repos
/ forks"?
What distinguishes bet
> Is there a list of all the derived/customized dwm versions?
http://prog.marmaro.de/dwm-meillo/
meillo
> I've been working with cmus lately and am beginning to like. I'd like
> to take an informal poll of what console music people use and why.
I started with `mpd/ncmpc' but didn't liked the client/server-approach
Then used `moc' (mocp on Debian) for a while, but it was quite unstable
with adding
> http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20070927.png
I just wanted to tell you to update the link to this new shot on the site
... but then I thought, that I can do it on my own ... so I did.
Is this okay? Is this wanted?
... only to be sure.
btw:
I find "my" screen-statusbar on the screenshot *y
> .Xresources
just want to mention, that this file's name '.Xresources' has changed to
'.Xdefaults' in newer versions of X
Anyway, you should have the file with one of the two names and the other
name symlinked to the first.
That's information I read somewhere.
I only tested, that .Xresources o
Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your terminal colors are amazing...
thanks
> Would you mind sharing your .XResources or whatever file you are using
> to set your colorscheme? I would like to imitate it if you wouldn't
> mind :-D
I saw you found them.
For everyone else, here they
Hoi folks,
after a long time (since 3.5) I updated "my" patches to the current tip.
As you perhaps remember/know, I habe only 2 tags between I toggle. I use them
as workspaces. Clients are matched to only one tag.
So my Workflow is somehow different from normal dwm tagging style, but it is
high
Hoi developers,
if I understood the code right, then you should change this comment to
say more clearly what these lines are for.
I needed some minutes to figure out what the comment meant ...
Okay, the new comment isn't perfect either ... maybe something in between
should be chosen.
markus
Jeroen Schot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:52:46AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > Two #include lines make a file "ugly"? How so?
>
> It's not about the number of lines, it's about the concept. When I add a
> layout (say 'gridmode') it will look:
>
> #include "tile.h"
>
Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of you guys, who use nmaster for having two terminal windows
> one above the other just use screen(1)'s split function. It's very
> practical and so much simpler than fiddling with nmaster and trying to
> get correct windows where intended.
Ri
Hi arg,
http://www.suckless.org/cgi-bin/man/man2html?query=dwm
shows version 3.5
would be a good idea to update it.
A better idea would be to automate it.
markus
Szabolcs Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ps: you don't have to tell us your life story when you have a problem
oh, I loved to read about his experiences ...
he even included this hint for you to skip this first paragraph -- very
polite, I think
markus
Julian Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm quite comfortable with my terminus choice but I'm curious...
>
> Which fonts are you guys using?
I use Terminus too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On http://na.srck.net/dwm/dwmsloccountrevs.png I placed plot of
> sloccount per rev. On X axis are revs placed and on Y axis are
> sloccounts.
Funny, I thought about asking for that yesterday :-D
so thanks for it.
How have you created it? Would
David Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |strip could be run via an own target `debug' or so, that is not called
> |by `all'
>
> Ah, although I guess you mean the other way around: you don't want
> to do the strip you'd normally do when doing a debugging build.
yes, of course ;-)
David Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not a make expert: is there any way to convert the strip command
> in the makefile to a symbolic command that can be set in config.mk?
> (I normally change config.mk and then forget to comment out the
> strip in the makefile so I don't get debugging info
Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) You want make dwm simplier ...
wasn't the old way to KISS?
customizing should be done by patching source code
right?
yes, a switch like suggested would surely be nice
... but perhaps simple would be better!?
just to think about
Meillo r e
> Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...
urxvt
arg wrote:
> I like untiled. The reason why I changed floating is that it
> clashes with the datatype, however tile() and untile() seem
> straight-forward. I go for it.
... and tile/untile really shows that dwm is about tiling :_)
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
