Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 1/20/09, andrew wrote: > Specify commands as a list of argument strings? SHCMD("put your posix compliant shell script here") > I don't even recognize the key array as C code ... {.v = dmenucmd} }, to use dwm you need to know the c language ..specifically c99 > Tagmasks? Why are we forcing

Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread yy
2009/1/20 andrew : > I've spent a lot of time with awesome in the past months, since it > had, at the time, a sensible tiling system and some of the features I > wanted that dwm lacked. Unfortunately, with the progression to the > latest major revision, lua integration has ruined its usability. And

Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Mate Nagy
Hiya, > The website lists clarity as a feature. Clarity! > As for only having to learn C code to edit the config, I know C > reasonably well, but I get bad vibes from config.h, I think I'd rather > try to learn Lua. do consider the alternatives - xmonad is a smashing tiling wm (using it now for it

Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-19 Thread Jack Woehr
andrew wrote: Tagmasks? Why are we forcing the user to do this in binary? /I considered re-using stdin as well, but in any case having customization features will lead to more code, esp. more only-once executed code, that's why I don't like either way much... And it doesn't keeps the novices

[dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-19 Thread andrew
I've spent a lot of time with awesome in the past months, since it had, at the time, a sensible tiling system and some of the features I wanted that dwm lacked. Unfortunately, with the progression to the latest major revision, lua integration has ruined its usability. And so I came back to poke aro