Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4 codebase. Mmh, I am not very familiar with

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread James Turner
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - James Turner * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 18:43 - On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread Brendan MacDonell
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de wrote: Patching works without problems but I get this warnings: dwm.c:1640: warning: 'viewnext' defined but not used dwm.c:1657: warning: 'viewprevious' defined but not used And, what should I say, it