Re: [dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-18 Thread David Tweed
On Jan 17, 2008 9:50 PM, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls. This will make dwm unportable and we

Re: [dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-18 Thread Sylvain Bertrand
2008/1/17, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls. This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the

[dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-17 Thread Sylvain Bertrand
Hi, I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C library. I know I just need to perform direct Linux syscalls and it will be fine. But, I would like to load ELF shared objects in my process space and for that, the only way I know is to use the dynamic linking lib from the C

Re: [dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-17 Thread pancake
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: Hi, I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C library. I know I just need to perform direct Linux syscalls and it will be fine. But, I would like to load ELF shared objects in my process space and for

Re: [dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-17 Thread markus schnalke
Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls. This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the different ways to communicate with X11 (socket

Re: [dwm] Minimalism

2008-01-17 Thread Christian Garbs
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C library. Have you had a look at the dietlibc? It's a shrunken C library: http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/ Regards, Christian --