On Jan 17, 2008 9:50 PM, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the
X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls.
This will make dwm unportable and we
2008/1/17, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the
X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls.
This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the
Hi,
I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C
library. I know I just need to perform direct Linux syscalls and it
will be fine. But, I would like to load ELF shared objects in my
process space and for that, the only way I know is to use the dynamic
linking lib from the C
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C
library. I know I just need to perform direct Linux syscalls and it
will be fine. But, I would like to load ELF shared objects in my
process space and for
Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for dwm, I don't know what would be the cost to build directly the
X11 packets or to recode the XCB lib straight on Linux syscalls.
This will make dwm unportable and we should implement the different
ways to communicate with X11 (socket
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
I'm looking to reduce my software stack and I'm targeting the C
library.
Have you had a look at the dietlibc? It's a shrunken C library:
http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/
Regards,
Christian
--