the floating mode flag in the layout is a bit ugly
Well, if you have a better proposal for 4.9, let me know.
I like ~ as a floating layout flag ...
--
Damjan Vrenčur ~ http://lmmri.fri.uni-lj.si/damjan/ ~ GPG key: C6A3146F
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:33:28PM +0100, Damjan Vrencur wrote:
the floating mode flag in the layout is a bit ugly
Well, if you have a better proposal for 4.9, let me know.
I like ~ as a floating layout flag ...
Well, the layout symbol is up to the user anyways ;)
Questionable
Actually 4.7 has been for me feature complete and subjectively bug free.
In 4.8 there are new things for which I am unable to imagine a scenario
of use (both monocle and vertical tile) and one thing which I miss (the
possibility to toggle the bar).
But this is not a real problem for me, vanilla
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:56:58PM +0100, Giorgio Lando wrote:
Actually 4.7 has been for me feature complete and subjectively bug free.
In 4.8 there are new things for which I am unable to imagine a scenario
of use (both monocle and vertical tile) and one thing which I miss (the
possibility to
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:07:55PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 01:56:58PM +0100, Giorgio Lando wrote:
Actually 4.7 has been for me feature complete and subjectively bug free.
In 4.8 there are new things for which I am unable to imagine a scenario
of use (both
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:26:21 +0100
Joerg van den Hoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and contrary to the initial post I'd say `monocle' is very
useful indeed. but 'vertical tile' does not make sense, at
least not on a single monitor, not for me in any case. (by-
the-by, if 'vertical' is the
I like the new changes, the code is more dynamic yet not really any larger
or complex. If you find it unstable, us an older version until you think it
is stable? Especially if you say it it was already feature complete.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:42 AM, pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/13/08, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the multihead thing comming up, I realize a lot of new ideas in
different directions. Changes became big again and everything is a
little bit experimental.
Also
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:07:01PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
I remember a time (probably between version 4.1 or 4.4 or so), when
the development of dwm became more and more stable. dwm began to reach
a point near finished (or perfect). Changes became smaller, and
mostly it was optimizing
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/13/08, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the multihead thing comming up, I realize a lot of new ideas in
different directions. Changes became big again and everything is a
little bit experimental.
Also
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:49:10 +0100
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:52:20AM -0400, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 3/13/08, markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I've switched to wmii
11 matches
Mail list logo
