Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2009-04-24, 00:00): On 4/23/09, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote: Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding. dillo used to be nice.. until it started using c++ i'd rather use the tcl/tk html viewer, hv3 Second that. It's very light, fast and seems to be progressing in a good direction. -- [a] pgpqelbilS1nW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Antoni Grzymala schrieb: Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2009-04-24, 00:00): On 4/23/09, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote: Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding. dillo used to be nice.. until it started using c++ i'd rather use the tcl/tk html viewer, hv3 Second that. It's very light, fast and seems to be progressing in a good direction. If you are talking about hv3 then I will second that too. Unfortunately it's development stalled. Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner http://www.brain-dump.org/ GPG key: CF7D56C0
[dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Just to notify community: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1 Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Thanks, that sounds great! Now we only need a working flash replacement:( But I'm eager to try this out at home this evening. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Just to notify community: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1 Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Awesome, awesome idea but horrendous implementation. I'm sending this email from inside uzbl, but it's choking horribly on rendering gmail's ajax chat. Uzbl is much slower than /firefox/ with ten tabs. I'll be interested to see how this project progresses. -- Ian On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks, that sounds great! Now we only need a working flash replacement:( But I'm eager to try this out at home this evening. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Just to notify community: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1 Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
I like the idea, and browser itself, so far. I'm sending this email from inside uzbl, but it's choking horribly on rendering gmail's ajax chat. Uzbl is much slower than /firefox/ with ten tabs. Sending this from uzbl, gmail works fine except attachment feature.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:02:18 -0400 Ian Daniher it.dani...@gmail.com wrote: Awesome, awesome idea but horrendous implementation. I'm sending this email from inside uzbl, but it's choking horribly on rendering gmail's ajax chat. Uzbl is much slower than /firefox/ with ten tabs. I'll be interested to see how this project progresses. -- Ian On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks, that sounds great! Now we only need a working flash replacement:( But I'm eager to try this out at home this evening. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Just to notify community: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1 Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting. I am not having any problems but rendering related ones are probably because of webkit version. I have 1.1.5-1 webkit on archlinux and it's fast.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:02:18 -0400 Ian Daniher it.dani...@gmail.com wrote: Awesome, awesome idea but horrendous implementation. I'm sending this email from inside uzbl, but it's choking horribly on rendering gmail's ajax chat. Uzbl is much slower than /firefox/ with ten tabs. I'll be interested to see how this project progresses. -- Ian On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks, that sounds great! Now we only need a working flash replacement:( But I'm eager to try this out at home this evening. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Just to notify community: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=70700p=1 Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting. I am not having any problems but rendering related ones are probably because of webkit version. I have 1.1.5-1 webkit on archlinux and it's fast.
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
On 4/23/09, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote: Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding. dillo used to be nice.. until it started using c++ i'd rather use the tcl/tk html viewer, hv3 On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Now we only need a working flash replacement:( no, flash is conceptually broken, it should not exist on the web On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting. umm webkit was a 300 KLOC monster last time i checked
Re: [dwm] uzbl. A browser that adheres to the unix philosophy.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/23/09, pmarin pacog...@gmail.com wrote: Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding. dillo used to be nice.. until it started using c++ i'd rather use the tcl/tk html viewer, hv3 Dillo was never nice. It's always been crippled -- both from a functionality standpoint and a development-process standpoint. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote: Now we only need a working flash replacement:( no, flash is conceptually broken, it should not exist on the web I agree with this; nevertheless, command-line tools work fine for grabbing flash video (and playing it with mplayer or xine). Interactive flash is a nightmare that I'm happy to avoid. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com wrote: Web kit minimal browser, you will find it very interesting. umm webkit was a 300 KLOC monster last time i checked there isn't a non-crippled alternative, though -- not if you require access to javascript- and css-enabled sites. I use midori when I have to, links otherwise. # Kurt H Maier
