On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 07:27:19AM -0800, mikshaw wrote:
--- Richard Pöttler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
I am using tcsh and got some problems, when i want
to start a program
with M+p. The problem is, that tcsh assigns
variables with set name
value and not like the sh shells
Note, I will investigate into the Java compliance issue again in
January. I hope that we will get some usable workaround for the
broken XToolkit, that we can get rid of the MToolkit. My
favorized solution might be a JDK-fix. I once already was about
starting to hack XWM.java of the XToolkit, but
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:30:40AM -0500, Ross Mohn wrote:
I'm interested in replacing the right hand side of the dwm status bar
with dzen. Has someone already worked out best practices for doing this?
One issues I've run into is the dynamic width of the text printed. For
example, if I'm
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:22:47AM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
Ritesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Dec 19, 2007 2:29 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:15:19AM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
I was thinking of a new feature to dwm where one can cycle
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 12:46:32PM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote:
So is the plan to do some kind of color swap on the status bar, or can
we do something slightly more flexible? It would be nice if we could
treat it just like a keybinding. That way I can set an exec call in
config.h to call a
even greater would be a patch where we could define the height of that
increment in config.h or sth like that :)
ps: i guess this reply is just a plead to someone in this list to actually
create that patch :|
On 21-12-2007 12:52, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at
Hi, All.
DWM remember which client was focused lat. When I close my current
window by modkey+shift+c, focus folow to previous active, but client
dont move to master area. Its not useful.
How can I change dwm source to work it properly?
I have changed dwm.c, but this not the best.
diff -ur
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:05:18PM +0100, Panos P. wrote:
even greater would be a patch where we could define the height of that
increment in config.h or sth like that :)
I think BARPOS can be replaced with something more flexible
which enables us to achieve this. But I don't consider this for
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
triki: Sadly I was too busy to launch the new wiki in time. I
reschedule it for end of year 2007.
The same on css side, sorry.
Anyway I didn't forget it, expect something working in a short time ;)
--
Marco Squarcina |
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 05:48:57PM +0300, ?? wrote:
DWM remember which client was focused lat. When I close my current
window by modkey+shift+c, focus folow to previous active, but client
dont move to master area. Its not useful.
How can I change dwm source to work it properly?
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Hi there,
I've been rather busy the last weeks. Here is my current
roadmap:
dwm-4.8: I expect it for next week, it will include
multihead/Xinerama support by Christof Musik (he will be added
to the copyright holders), an
I would suggest this as a feature.
May be its a feature :) But I close programs wich I dont want to close often.
Hi,
dvtm version 0.1 is out, get it while it's hot, changes include:
- new default modifier (CTRL+G)
- better performance (lower default redraw timeout, other fixes)
- settimeout function which allows to set the redraw timeout via
key bindings.
- display the window number in the title bar
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:36:36PM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:22:47AM +0100, Engin Tola wrote:
Ritesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Dec 19, 2007 2:29 AM, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 05:48:57PM +0300, Станислав wrote:
Hi, All.
DWM remember which client was focused lat. When I close my current
window by modkey+shift+c, focus folow to previous active, but client
dont move to master area. Its not useful.
How can I change dwm source to work it
In a box of my parent's home I have an ubuntu box with gnome.
They feel comfortable with metacity because it doesn't needs
to learn any keybinding, but when i'm using it I feel really
uncomfortable and I have to use dwm.
I have decided to try to adapt dwm to fit with metacity and
gnome-menu and
Anselm R. Garbe пишет:
I doubt what you do is the correct way. First of all you don't
need to change dwm.c at all for achieving this, you get the same
behavior as follows from config.h:
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_c, killclient, NULL },
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_c, focusnext, NULL },
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 11:17:42PM +0100, pancake wrote:
Cool release!
Did you was able to run dvtm on openbsd or netbsd? I dunno... looks
like librote needs pty.h which is not a bsd stuff (dont know in fbsd)
but building librote with --disable-pty makes the dvtm build faild
because of an
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 11:53:47PM +0100, pancake wrote:
You should use Desktop instead.
The problem is that this rule is ignored ://
I bet the desktop fullscreen window has set the
override_redirect hint. Check with
; xwininfo | grep Redirect
If that's the case.
[EMAIL
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:06:15PM -0500, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 03:41:52AM +0100, pancake wrote:
What do you think about supporting this feature?
I think that 'alt+shift+tab' should be the keybinding.
I could see that as at least interesting to try out.
20 matches
Mail list logo
