I am looking for the pertag patch for 5.4. Is it available anywhere?
Kind regards,
henry
Yes, it is. I updated it a couple of days ago, but for some reason arg
still hasn't put it one the wiki =P
You can get it here:
http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0812/7209.html
--Valentin
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:18:31 +0100
henry atting wrote:
> I am looking for the pertag patch for 5.4. Is it avail
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, Valentin wrote:
> Yes, it is. I updated it a couple of days ago, but for some reason arg
> still hasn't put it one the wiki =P
> You can get it here:
> http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0812/7209.html
Very nice, thanks :)
henry
Valentin send it to the mailing list, some days ago:
http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0812/7209.html
v4hn
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:18:31PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
> I am looking for the pertag patch for 5.4. Is it available anywhere?
>
> Kind regards,
> henry
>
pgp2RLbWc9mhG.pgp
Descript
Mmh, I must have got it wrong.
I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to
bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the
current one.
As far as I can see this is not what pertag does...
henry
I have been experimenting with user interfaces concepts lately.
My first aim was a simple mp3 player. The code has been adapted later
to do other tasks, and now it is some sort of generic list manager,
where items can be played. It was initially based on dmenu-3.9 (that's
the reason it is announced
Good evening.
Am Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:53:10 +0100 schrieb yy :
> I have been experimenting with user interfaces concepts lately.
> My first aim was a simple mp3 player. The code has been adapted later
> to do other tasks, and now it is some sort of generic list manager,
> where items can be played.
2009/1/2 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
>
> You are recreating acme(1) with less features.
>
Maybe, acme is probably the user interface which has inspired me more
in the last years. OTOH, using acme (or libframe, I don't know very
much about the internals) would probably be the right way to im
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
> Mmh, I must have got it wrong.
> I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to
> bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the
> current one.
> As far as I can see this is not what pert
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
>> Mmh, I must have got it wrong.
>> I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to
>> bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the
>> current one.
>> A
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:41:08PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
> Okay, I have three tags, suppose the layout of all is tiled. I switch to the
> third tag and change the layout to floating. As a result all three tags now
> have a floating layout.
I suppose you didn't apply the patch clean/at all(?).
Helo,
in this times everyone has to be flexible, so get your special df
version, which can easily display 113K Byte Blocks ;)
./evildf
usage: ./evildf /Mountpoint Blocksize(1024/n)
,bash evildf / 3.5
evildf: 1024/3.5: syntax error in expression (error token is ".5")
#Filesystem Size
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:41:08PM +0100, henry atting wrote:
>> Okay, I have three tags, suppose the layout of all is tiled. I switch to the
>> third tag and change the layout to floating. As a result all three tags now
>> have a floating layout.
>
> I suppose yo
13 matches
Mail list logo
