[dwm] dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Hello, I recently switched from awesome to dwm which gives me my desktop back ;) I am currently using 5.4 from Mecurial. Two questions: - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar.

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:17 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. config.h:15: warning: 'readin' defined

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - James Turner * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 18:43 - On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: 2008/12/13 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de: The tagging

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Brendan MacDonell * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 19:42 - On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de wrote: Patching works without problems but I get this warnings: dwm.c:1640: warning: 'viewnext' defined but not used dwm.c:1657: warning

[dwm] pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
I am looking for the pertag patch for 5.4. Is it available anywhere? Kind regards, henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, Valentin wrote: Yes, it is. I updated it a couple of days ago, but for some reason arg still hasn't put it one the wiki =P You can get it here: http://lists.suckless.org/dwm/0812/7209.html Very nice, thanks :) henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
Mmh, I must have got it wrong. I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the current one. As far as I can see this is not what pertag does... henry

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:12:45PM +0100, henry atting wrote: Mmh, I must have got it wrong. I expected if I change the layout of one tag - let's say from tiled to bottomstack - it would not change the layout of all tags but only the current one. As far as I

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-02 Thread henry atting
On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 08:41:08PM +0100, henry atting wrote: Okay, I have three tags, suppose the layout of all is tiled. I switch to the third tag and change the layout to floating. As a result all three tags now have a floating layout. I suppose you didn't

[dwm] Re: pertag patch

2009-01-03 Thread henry atting
On Sa, Jan 03 2009, daniel fusser wrote: 2009/1/3 henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de On Fr, Jan 02 2009, v4hn wrote: dwm.c:1743: error: redefinition of 'viewnext' dwm.c:1709: error: previous definition of 'viewnext' was here dwm.c:1760: error: redefinition of 'viewprevious' dwm.c

[dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread henry atting
I recently switched from dwm to xmonad. I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines. The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match. Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to