Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-26 Thread Yoshi Rokuko
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Christian Garbs wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:42:32PM +0100, hiro wrote: dwm arranges the windows on the screen, nothing more, nothing less. No program icons, no desktop environment, no notification services. Dwm is arranging windows dynamically, listens

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-25 Thread hiro
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:42:32PM +0100, hiro wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-25 Thread Jack Woehr
hiro wrote: Dwm is arranging windows dynamically, listens to multiple X events and, as far as I know, provides a status bar. It's doing quite some stuff in my view... Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue. --

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-25 Thread hiro
Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue. I don't understand a word, sorry. And yeah, I understand what simplicity is about...

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-25 Thread Jack Woehr
hiro wrote: Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue. I don't understand a word, sorry. And yeah, I understand what simplicity is about.. I didn't mean to imply that you hadn't. I mean there is a world of open

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote: To: dwm@suckless.org From: henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de Subject: [dwm] Re: What happened here? Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
I think andrew's point is about dwm's very own style. You can, though, use dwm without any problems out of the box, and thus I don't fully agree with him. Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Yoshi Rokuko
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM? regards, y0shi

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread yy
2009/1/20 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com: [snip] Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. Well, X doesn't look like UNIX neither, however you look at it. -- - yiyus || JGL .

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM? regards, y0shi Could be, that X doesn't

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not