Does anyone else think it is time to update the DXCC criteria to
specify a combination of the US Department of State Independent
States in the World list http://www.state.gov/s/inr/rls/4250.htm
plus the list of Dependencies and Areas of Special Sovereignty
_Independent States in the World_ (http://www.state.gov/s/inr/rls/4250.htm)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL
Home.
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15ncid=aolhom000301)
Hey Joe,
Nope, don't like it, I've been chasing DXCC since 1969, almost 40 years and
I vote with ARRL and the way they do things.
I know strictly I don't get to vote, being a G but they make it interesting.
I love the DXCC and thanks to the ARRL for giving me something
to chase.
Regards.
David
Whilst not wanting get embroiled in a is it or isn't it situation - I'd
venture to suggest it does need a look at.
In NO way, shape or form is Scarborough Reef an entity. It is a rock,
or to be more specific a collection of rocks.
There are many others out there too that need some
No wonder why IOTA has become so popular !
73 Rag LA5HE
--- David Rollitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Hey Joe,
Nope, don't like it, I've been chasing DXCC since
1969, almost 40 years and
I vote with ARRL and the way they do things.
I know strictly I don't get to vote, being a G but
they
Under the current rules, collections of rocks will no longer meet the
minimum geographic requirements to become a DXCC entity.
And certain entities that got on the list under Special Administrative
Area type rules, like Mt. Athos, will also no longer get on the list.
Let's keep that in
