Re: [DX-CHAT] [DX-NEWS] P5

2005-03-06 Thread G4IRN
1. Many of the existing entities are historical. A complete restructure of the DXCC list would be confusing and bring discredit to the whole set up. 2. Adding new entities to DXCC will make it like IOTA - you will never have anything to aim for because the list is ever growing. 3. If you've

Re: [DX-CHAT] [DX-NEWS] P5

2005-03-06 Thread Mome Z32ZM
If approve truth that P5/4L4FN operation was ILEGAL without papers, It will be MY PLEASURE to return this QSL card to the Manager (KK5DO) I'm sure that ALL real HAM's from all over the world will do the same. I do have the P5RS7 QSL card in my collection, so this P5/4L4FN is not

(Fwd) Re: [DX-CHAT] [DX-NEWS] P5

2005-03-05 Thread Steve-KF2TI
You touch the main point (and mni others on QAP too). Just to remaind all DX'ers here: That discussion on this thread has been and should continue on the DX- CHAR reflector (subcribing info at the bottom of this post) Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

Re: [DX-CHAT] [DX-NEWS] P5

2005-03-05 Thread Ron Notarius
Am I reading this right? Is it now being asserted that P5/4L4FN went into hiding to avoid contact with YT1AD YU7AV when they attempted the aborted P5A operation? And that Ed may have had something to do with the lack of DPRK Military permission to operate P5A? What is this, the X-Files?