I've heard worse reasons!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Win
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:30 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Re:Digital robots
I'm with John on this,,because I like his QSL card.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re:Digital robots
At 06:15 PM 11/26/2007, you wrote:
>1. The ARRL didn't push through the no code test license. Has everyone
>forgotten No Code Internation
I'm with John on this,,because I like his QSL card.
Win, W0LZ
- Original Message -
From: "john" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re:Digital robots
At 06:15 PM 11/26/200
At 06:15 PM 11/26/2007, you wrote:
1. The ARRL didn't push through the no code test license. Has everyone
forgotten No Code International?
They defended the "code test license" with all the enthusiasm of a wet noodle.
3. The digital robots exist. They're already out there. Their operat
ave our best
interests in mind.
73
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:51 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re:Digital robots
Remember incentive licensing? Now, a few decades lat
Remember incentive licensing? Now, a few decades later, and money is tight,
a license without code gets through the FCC. Have to keep up the membership,
you know. But now they want dx space for digital robots.
Am I missing something?
David Miller W1GDQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
