Today, on 10.104 MHz, C52C was QRV, listening up. A class
operation by class operators. However, as soon as the spots started
on the clusters, the jammers and fools showed up and zero beat their
transmit frequency.
Carriers, someone trying to play the theme from The Lone
Ranger
If we deny the jammers feedback we reduce their incidence.
Wonder how many suicide bombers there would be if the news said only this
abt them:
A bomb exploded in xxyyxx today end of story... no pictures... no
other statements. It would be too much to ask news not to report it at all,
but
I can't unsubscribe from this chat forum. I've tried the unsubscribe button
on the NJDXA web page and get a page not found error message.
Then I tried sending an email direct as called for on the web site and it
bounces with the following response:
Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason:
I think a good portion of intentional qrm comes from frustration. The other
part from basic mean spiritedness.
Today, the desire for (and advertisements that teach the need for) instant
gratification is a feature of life. But, such gratification is not often in
the cards. Thus, resident
I guess the only solution is to ignore if you can and steal their pleasure.
If we could get every single ham who wanted to work the DX to have
infinite patience and totally ignore the jammers, they'll go away.
The DX will always hear everyone in a split pile, and there will
always be a good
My experience listening to C52C on 40m was that the jammers couldn't
touch 'em ;-)
Tuners, intentional QRM, other such BS and C52C was just sailing over 'em.
Doesn't let the QRMers off the hook, but it is something I like to hear.
Dan
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
While I agree with the observations, amateurs cannot expect these government
agencies to solve our problems. They do not have the money, personnel, or
interest to soend on something so trivial in the grand scheme of things {not
trivial to us, but to them}.
What can we do? Well, I can't help
