Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread ON7YX

Qsl address on the ZW0S qsl :

PS7JN Joaquim das Virgens Neto
Rua Carlos Serrano,1969
59076-740 Natal-RN-Brazil

73's Ron ON7YX
- Original Message - 
From: Mark Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:58 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] QSL info


Does anyone have a good qsl route for PY0S/PS7JN.  I sent a qsl via 
qrz.com  at the following address, with no success.  I sent it Sept'05 .

  Joca Neto
  P.O.BOX 251
  59010-970  Natal-Rn
  Brazil.

Any info would be appreaciated.
Thanks
73,
Mark
K2AU


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org





Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




[DX-CHAT] ZS0S via PS7JN

2006-03-29 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
Someone may want to organize a registered group mailing to Joca.

Try asking the [EMAIL PROTECTED] reflector, I think there was a similar
discussion there a week ago.

73 - Jim AD1C

p.s. I have 100% success getting cards from him. Maybe I'm just lucky.

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread N7MAL



I have received several emails reminding me LOTW is, at best, 
only available for ARRL DXCC  WAS. WHY??? Why can't the ARRL make LOTW 
information available via a 'read-only' search engine. Logbook search engines 
are a 'dime-a-dozen', the technology is readily available and does not have to 
be re-invented. There is nothing secretive about the fact I worked station XYX 
on 20m CW. Making QSL information readily available, to anyone,would not 
compromise anything.
Awards like IOTA, for example,could then establish their 
own guidelines for how/when this information could be used in lieu of the 
hard/impossible to acquire QSL cards.
The LOTW system is, I think we all agree,very secure and 
very accurate because of the way it was designed, implemented and managed. I 
think the next step is to use LOTW to be part of the solution, not part of the 
problem.

c.c. Wayne Mills ARRL LOTW


MAL 
N7MALBULLHEAD CITY, AZhttp://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htmhttp://geocities.com/n7mal/Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.It's 
already tomorrow in Australia

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  N7MAL 
  Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info
  
  Seems to a simple minded person, like me, the solution is 
  LOTW. With all the talent/influence on this mailing list something could be 
  worked out.
  
  
  MAL 
  N7MALBULLHEAD CITY, AZhttp://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htmhttp://geocities.com/n7mal/Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.It's 
  already tomorrow in Australia
  







Thanks for the update on webpage and news report. I have tried to 
comfirmwith Joca since 2003 ZW0S and later QSO's with no luck . Well 
over 50 bucksin postage, registered mail,plus green stamps and IRC's. I 
have been inemail with Joca and know his problem exists other than in 
his hands. I donot have Peter Paul Rocks comfirmed yet. I have just 
about given up, howmuch should it cost for a confirmation? Since most do 
participate in theDXCC program, maybe the logs could be emailed directly 
to Bill at ARRL andthey can be confirmed that way, or a stateside 
manager, or something..whoknows at this point. I honestly would like it 
confirmed but can't afford itanymore. Depressing. I hope they catch the 
postal crooks and beat there 
assgood. 
73 Pete NA2P


RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Title: Message



 Why can't the 
ARRL make LOTW information available via a 'read-only' 
 search 
engine. 

Quite simply, the 
ARRL does not want anyone "trolling" for QSOs. Either 
the information 
uploaded by both stations matches or it does not. To 
allow unrestricted 
searching would invite the followingabuse: 

W4TV searches for 
unconfirmed QSOs with: K4TV, W4TU,W4NU,W3TV, 
W3TU,
W3NU, W4EV, W3EV on 
CW and W4TB, W4TD, W4TE on phone. Onfinding an 
entry that is 
"needed" sends the station/manager a card with a note 
claiming to have 
been the one to have made the the QSO "but QRM or QRN 
must have effected 
what you heard." 

There is an API 
available to award sponsors who wish to accept LotW 
confirmations. It is easy for them to submit an inquiry to LotW and 

get a confirmation 
or rejection. The ball is in their court ... 


73, ... Joe, 
W4TV 



  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  N7MALSent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:09 PMTo: 
  N7MAL; DX ChatCc: Mills, Wayne N7NGSubject: Re: 
  [DX-CHAT] QSL info
  I have received several emails reminding me LOTW is, at 
  best, only available for ARRL DXCC  WAS. WHY??? Why can't the ARRL make 
  LOTW information available via a 'read-only' search engine. Logbook search 
  engines are a 'dime-a-dozen', the technology is readily available and does not 
  have to be re-invented. There is nothing secretive about the fact I worked 
  station XYX on 20m CW. Making QSL information readily available, to 
  anyone,would not compromise anything.
  Awards like IOTA, for example,could then establish 
  their own guidelines for how/when this information could be used in lieu of 
  the hard/impossible to acquire QSL cards.
  The LOTW system is, I think we all agree,very secure 
  and very accurate because of the way it was designed, implemented and managed. 
  I think the next step is to use LOTW to be part of the solution, not part of 
  the problem.
  
  c.c. Wayne Mills ARRL LOTW
  
  
  MAL 
  N7MALBULLHEAD CITY, AZhttp://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htmhttp://geocities.com/n7mal/Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.It's 
  already tomorrow in Australia
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
N7MAL 
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

Seems to a simple minded person, like me, the solution is 
LOTW. With all the talent/influence on this mailing list something could be 
worked out.


MAL 
N7MALBULLHEAD CITY, AZhttp://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htmhttp://geocities.com/n7mal/Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.It's 
already tomorrow in Australia

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Thanks for the update on webpage and news report. I have tried to 
  comfirmwith Joca since 2003 ZW0S and later QSO's with no luck . Well 
  over 50 bucksin postage, registered mail,plus green stamps and IRC's. 
  I have been inemail with Joca and know his problem exists other than 
  in his hands. I donot have Peter Paul Rocks comfirmed yet. I have just 
  about given up, howmuch should it cost for a confirmation? Since most 
  do participate in theDXCC program, maybe the logs could be emailed 
  directly to Bill at ARRL andthey can be confirmed that way, or a 
  stateside manager, or something..whoknows at this point. I honestly 
  would like it confirmed but can't afford itanymore. Depressing. I hope 
  they catch the postal crooks and beat there 
  assgood. 
  73 Pete NA2P


Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Penta








Well, for starters ... your
right ... BUT online logs state band and mode only, no time or date. A contact
means getting the call right, and an exchange of a correct signal report at the
least. TROLLING for BUSTED CALLS, if you didn't get the call right, well maybe
you should just delete it out of your log, it wasn't a valid Q in my book. I
see it all too much lately guys with busted calls trying to find the manager or
QSL route, oviously there is none until they find it's a bad call and correct
it with the right one. But you know what? WHATEVER, if it makes them happy than
I am happy. But, it was no real contact in my book, and everyone has books,
they read them the way they see fit. That's why the ARRL does not want to
publish the DATA, band and mode would be OK, date and times never. ESP
contacts, busted calls, no confirmation on air of received report, all kind of
sickening. GREED, it's a terrible thing.








Have a good day, and make sure you get the call right. 73 Pete NA2P
















RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info TROLLing

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Penta
Title: Message








You are rightthe few B0Z0s
ruin it for all. Just like the morons who decided to take 18 MHz, 17meter cards
and decided they wanted to be top banders and toss in a period.  1.8 MHz WOW
!!! I am on 160 and getting cards  Sad but true.  Now top banders either
have to drive to ARRL like myself to get cards checked in person or mail the
160 cards to them for them to see Its hard to GET cards via direct mail
sometimeswhy the hell am I gonna send a good card out in the mail again
! I guess ARRL has seen it all and are fed up with the B0Z0s so now
everyone suffers. I wonder when someone---a bonehead--- will start an ESP
contact net? I would love to listen when I am bored .




73 Pete NA2P











From: N7MAL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006
5:44 PM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV; 'DX Chat';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info
TROLLing







I have never heard of the Trolling thing until today. How
serious/rampant is this Trolling? Is there any serious documentation available?





How does it effect yours or my certificates? Can you or I no longer
point to our certificates with pride?











The bottom line to those questions, at least from my point of view, is
who cares. As long as you or I can point to our certificates and know we got
them honestly why do we care what station BØZØ does.It doesn't water-down
my certificates. In this particular case if it means NA2P is finally going to
get his contact confirmed then we will have made progress. We can't stop or
suspend progress because of a few bozo's, who, by the way,will
alwaysfind a way to be bozo's.No matter how well designed, or secure,a system
is designed BØZØ will always find a way to compromise it, that's life. I think
we need to spend more time pointing out our accomplishments and less time
pointing fingers at, or even acknowledging,the bozo's.


















MAL

N7MAL
BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
http://geocities.com/n7mal/
Don't worry about the
world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia





Date: 3/28/2006










RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info TROLLing

2006-03-29 Thread n7ef







Dude! DUDE!! You are impugning a great group of radio amateurs:

http://www.ab0zo.org/

Welcome to the b0ZO Amateur Radio Fraternity!

Apologies are in order



-- Original message from Peter Penta [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- 








You are right…the few B0Z0’s ruin it for all. Just like the morons who decided to take 18 MHz, 17meter cards and decided they wanted to be top banders and toss in a period. 1.8 MHz WOW !!! I am on 160 and getting cards  Sad but true. Now top banders either have to drive to ARRL like myself to get cards checked in person or mail the 160 cards to them for them to see …Its hard to GET cards via direct mail sometimes…why the hell am I gonna send a good card out in the mail again ! I guess ARRL has seen it all and are fed up with the B0Z0’s so now everyone suffers. I wonder when someone---a bonehead--- will start an ESP contact net? I would love to listen when I am bored .

73 Pete NA2P





From: N7MAL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:44 PMTo: Joe Subich, W4TV; 'DX Chat'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info TROLLing


I have never heard of the Trolling thing until today. How serious/rampant is this Trolling? Is there any serious documentation available?

How does it effect yours or my certificates? Can you or I no longer point to our certificates with pride?



The bottom line to those questions, at least from my point of view, is who cares. As long as you or I can point to our certificates and know we got them honestly why do we care what station BØZØ does.It doesn't water-down my certificates. In this particular case if it means NA2P is finally going to get his contact confirmed then we will have made progress. We can't stop or suspend progress because of a few bozo's, who, by the way,will alwaysfind a way to be bozo's.No matter how well designed, or secure,a system is designed BØZØ will always find a way to compromise it, that's life. I think we need to spend more time pointing out our accomplishments and less time pointing fingers at, or even acknowledging,the bozo's.





MAL N7MALBULLHEAD CITY, AZhttp://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htmhttp://geocities.com/n7mal/Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.It's already tomorrow in Australia

Date: 3/28/2006






Re: [DX-CHAT] 2° MDXC HF Convention - timing

2006-03-29 Thread Zack Widup

Yes, and same date as a local hamfest here (Peoria Superfest), the W9DXCC 
convention and the second weekend of the 10 GHz contest.

What's a guy to do?  :-)

73, Zack W9SZ


On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Ragnar Otterstad wrote:

 Bad timing - same weekend as the Clipperton DX Club meeting in Arcachon !
 
 
 73   Rag LA5HE
 
 
 we are happy to invite you at
 2° MDXC HF Convention (world meeting)
 the date of the event is 16  17 September 2006 in Nola city (Napoli
 Province) more info came in next time on www.mdxc.org
 
 Pease give max diffusion to the notice.
 
 regards from the meeting team
 IK8IVA #053  IK8XIR #035
 
 
  -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
 
 Mediterraneo Dx Club
 support Dx-pedition
 p.o.box 245 - 87100 Cosenza ITALY
 web portal www.mdxc.org
 
 
 Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
 http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
 
 To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
 
 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
 http://njdxa.org
 
 


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org