Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
At 09:02 PM 5/17/2007, Mark Robinson wrote:
How did they figure the US zones - by call sign which isn't too
accurate now. My friend a W4 worked BS7H but he lives in 9 land -
did his contact count as a 4 land contact - I am sure that it did. I
wonder how many Zone 5
Looks like I was off by 5%... I figured 10% of Zone 5 calls weren't
actually in Zone 5.
Still a pretty good distribution across N.A.
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT
BS7H QSO statistics have been posted on their website. Very interesting
reading. Should make for some good conversation.
www.bs7h.com
Good DX CU at Dayton
Garth, KW4MM
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only,
This throws a lot of whining into sharp perspective.
They didn't work the U.S. enough? We're second only to JA.
Totally impenetrable JA wall? JA was only 900 hams ahead of the U.S.
total. Granted they had 3x the QSO's but who around here had a real
shot on, say, 40m.
BS7H impossible from
: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
This throws a lot of whining into sharp perspective.
They didn't work the U.S. enough? We're second only to JA.
Totally impenetrable JA wall? JA was only 900 hams ahead of the U.S.
total. Granted they had 3x the QSO's but who around here had a real
shot on, say
How did they figure the US zones - by call sign which isn't too accurate
now.
That might be right, but I don't think it's *too* inaccurate. I think
the overall situation is still that the numbers more or less match up
here.
If you want to do a sample, just type random 1x2 calls into qrz and
: Dan Zimmerman N3OX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
This throws a lot of whining into sharp perspective.
They didn't work the U.S. enough? We're second only to JA.
Totally impenetrable JA wall? JA was only 900
May, 2007 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
How did they figure the US zones - by call sign which isn't too accurate
now.
That might be right, but I don't think it's *too* inaccurate. I think
the overall situation is still that the numbers more or less match up
here.
If you want
, 2007 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
This throws a lot of whining into sharp perspective.
They didn't work the U.S. enough? We're second only to JA.
Totally impenetrable JA wall? JA was only 900 hams ahead of the U.S.
total. Granted they had 3x the QSO's but who around here had
: N4BAA - Jose Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
Mark,
I have to agree and am very sure you are correct regarding how they
figured the zones. Even so, I think the percentage may
At 09:02 PM 5/17/2007, Mark Robinson wrote:
How did they figure the US zones - by call sign which isn't too
accurate now. My friend a W4 worked BS7H but he lives in 9 land -
did his contact count as a 4 land contact - I am sure that it did. I
wonder how many Zone 5 and Zone 4 calls are
At 09:02 PM 5/17/2007, Mark Robinson wrote:
How did they figure the US zones - by call sign which isn't too
accurate now. My friend a W4 worked BS7H but he lives in 9 land -
did his contact count as a 4 land contact - I am sure that it did. I
wonder how many Zone 5 and Zone 4 calls are
- Original Message -
From: Jim Reisert AD1C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 May, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] BS7H QSO Stats
At 09:02 PM 5/17/2007, Mark Robinson wrote:
How did they figure the US zones
13 matches
Mail list logo
