time I _ever_
heard a
peep from the Atlantic Division DXAC rep, and I've been DX'ing for
close to
30 years. That is another story.
73
-Original Message-
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Ron Notarius W3WN; Dx-Chat
Subject: R
Well gang, KH8SI is on right this moment (2050Z)..decent signal 14194.95 QRZ
for East Coast only..GL
Tony, W4FOA
- Original Message -
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dx-Chat"
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] W
e Atlantic Division DXAC rep, and I've been DX'ing for close to
30 years. That is another story.
73
-Original Message-
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 2:38 PM
To: Ron Notarius W3WN; Dx-Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Why the new DXCC rule
On Jul 29, 2006, at 11:38 AM, David Johnson wrote:
This rule has been discussed many times. At the Visalia DX
Convention for example, Wayne Mills talked about it at length
before a very large crowd of DXers. He even ask for a show of
hands from those who would like to see some new additi
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dx-Chat"
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:13 AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Why the new DXCC rule
Under the existing DXCC rules (aka DXCC 2000), there was originally a rule
that permitted recognizing a new or existing entity if there was an
existing
IARU society.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Creating "New Ones" stimulates the ARRL cash flow. Everyone otherwise
> stagnated, near or at the top, then submits an endorsement and
> accompanying $$$...
>
> Don N7EF
>
EXACTLY! Plus the donations from Yaecomwood to the DXpeditions of which
I'm sure ARRL gets a cu
Creating "New Ones" stimulates the ARRL cash flow. Everyone otherwise stagnated, near or at the top, then submits an endorsement and accompanying $$$...
Don N7EF
-- Original message from Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- > Just wondering why DXCC changed the rules to s
Let's not turn DXCC into another IOTA. Just because many of us have
worked them all, or close to it, doesn't mean we should to create new
ones using loop holes that were not the intent or spirit of the rules.
73,
Barry
John Warren wrote:
I suggested turning Andy ZD9BV, the only active ham on
Ron W3WN wrote:
The unintentional side effect was the creation of several new entities by
creation of an IARU society -- Ducie for one comes to mind, which followed
from the creation of the Pitcairn Is IARU society. Consider that at least
one of these IARU groups was created solely to in turn c
Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> Coincidence?
>
> I have nothing per se against a new entity. It's the process that bothers
> me. I'm in favor of open discussion and debate. Now I'm not saying that
> anything wrong was done... but I dislike an appearance of impropriety, and
> right now, there is (IMHO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Barry
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 6:42 AM
To: Dx-Chat
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Why the new DXCC rule
Just wondering why DXCC changed the rules to seemingly create one new
country for JA1BK. I didn't hear anything about rule change discussion
until rules were cha
Barry:
Kan has been lobbying the ARRL for some time to make Swain's Island a
new one. He ws the behind the first Ducie Island DXpedition that
Tom Christian VR6TC led a few years back, even though he wasn't on
Ducie, he was the $$$ behind it.
Tom, WW5L
.
Barry wrote:
Just wonderin
Just wondering why DXCC changed the rules to seemingly create one new
country for JA1BK. I didn't hear anything about rule change discussion
until rules were changed. Reminds me of the Okino Torishima situation...
73,
Barry
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP
Newtown, PA
13 matches
Mail list logo