ECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Wayne
That makes good sense - saves someone at HQ entering text for all the cards.
And for those submitting cards-only for HQ, why not allow them t
now to paper
loggings - except someone does not have to type it in at HQ.
_
From: wmills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
on the COO's plan
each year. Nothing yet.
73, Wayne, N7NG
Jackson Hole, Wyoming
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAI
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
So you suggest those that get field checked go to the head of the line?
And
n Behalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
And your submittal date should be the LOTW submission date, not the date the
application was received from the field, checker..this is what I have
already
ehalf Of Don
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'DX Chat'
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Please reread carefully
All I said is that the queue date is from LOTW submission, not the date from
field checking.
My example - I submitted 11/29/2007
is with the lack of adequate staffing to handle
the backlog.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
David:
You would think so.
ssion
with LOTW
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Don:
That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they c
week after hybrid field checking which
would have been a 1/5 or whatever.
So, LOTW DOES give you the advantage - LOTW first then field check.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: RE: [DX
One aspect of the problem hasn't been discussed before that I know of. A lot of
the aps are people who were at the "Top of the Honor Roll" who are simply
submitting an ap to cover a new entity that came along (FJ, etc.) and they want
to get "back on top". These aps are 1 or 2 cards at the most.
Some of the grumbling has apparently worked its way upstream. I understand that
a couple of more employees have now been assigned to checking cards at HQ. It
will still take them a long time to work their way out of the hole. I made the
LOTW portion of a dual application on March 6th. Without the a
The fastest way of all is to bring them to the ARRL HQ. in person & wait while
the cards are checked ( if I remember right there is an extra small fee ). Once
a year I call the day before so they expect me then do a LoTW submission & fill
in the # of paper cards I'll be bringing. Then the applic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DX Chat
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Don:
That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they call a "Hybrid"
submittal consisting of a few LOTW credits added to the main part of the
sub
David:
You would think so. Given the large backlog lately, I made a "very friendly"
suggestion to Bill Moore that they sort the submittals into 2 piles (Field
Checked and Physical Cards), and have the bulk of their effort directed at
Physical Card submittals. My belief was that the time require
Don:
That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they call a "Hybrid"
submittal consisting of a few LOTW credits added to the main part of the
submittal which is 92 QSO's that were field checked. My field checked paperwork
was mailed within a couple of days of when they were field checke
Only in terms of saving in mailing the cards and getting
them back. Once the app is processed by the field
checker, it still goes thri the process First in first out
So even if the chceker mails them in the next day, if the
process time is 6 weeks.
Steve KF2TI
NNJ DXCC Field Checker
On
Best advantage is you will not lose your cards in the mail and you save the
postage fees.
Bill W4WX
- Original Message -
From: wmills
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
There is little
I dunno. It still goes into the queue at HQ and the QSO's have to be
entered into their computer by someone. Probably not a lot of time
difference.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker
would give a f
There is little difference in processing time when submitting via a DXCC
field checker. In fact, it may take a little longer via a checker if the
field checker doesn't submit the application quickly. At HQ, there is
virtually no difference. The application goes into the queue along with all
others,
No difference.
Everything, whether field checked or HQ checked or partial LOTW or full
LOTW, gets processed along with all other submissions received at the same
time.
Now there is one trick to get you in sooner - it eliminates a mail
delay.submit a partial LOTW submission. The minute you push th
20 matches
Mail list logo