Re: [DX-CHAT] The New York Times

2006-12-29 Thread nick cominos
:33 AM Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] The New York Times CW will die a slow death, at least in the US. The no-code license is a dead end. It will be the rare no-coder that takes the time and effort to learn CW and stick with it long enough to become proficient for on the air use (i.e., 25-30 WPM

RE: [DX-CHAT] The New York Times

2006-12-27 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
The New York TimesMuch better of an article than I expected. Thanks for the tip! What I don't understand, though, is this: Why is the dropping of the code element for testing automatically seen by so many as the imminent demise of our use of the code? Yes, testing will no longer be required,

Re: [DX-CHAT] The New York Times

2006-12-27 Thread Barry
CW will die a slow death, at least in the US. The no-code license is a dead end. It will be the rare no-coder that takes the time and effort to learn CW and stick with it long enough to become proficient for on the air use (i.e., 25-30 WPM.) As we OFs get older and disappear, nobody will be

RE: [DX-CHAT] The New York Times

2006-12-27 Thread Charles Harpole
The NY Times again proved its grey lady of the newspapers distinction with a really great article about CW and ham radio The best I have ever seen on our beloved topic. 73 Charles Harpole, HS0ZCW [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From