To all who took time to reply to
my request for QSL information, Thank You.

The concensus is that CF6AUV was probably VE6AUV.
I logged the operators first name and that corraborates
the hypothosis.

I would normally reply individually but there were dozens
of replies.  Thank you each...

73,
Ken AB5A
 

-------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc 
DX-NEWS  http://njdxa.org/dx-news
DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net
-------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to