To all who took time to reply to my request for QSL information, Thank You.
The concensus is that CF6AUV was probably VE6AUV. I logged the operators first name and that corraborates the hypothosis. I would normally reply individually but there were dozens of replies. Thank you each... 73, Ken AB5A ------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc DX-NEWS http://njdxa.org/dx-news DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX NEWS items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/dx-news%40pro-usa.net -------------------------------------------------------