[Dx4win] Radio Control IC-756 Pro II

2004-04-26 Thread Howard Klein
Joe, I believe you need a level converter for the Icom radios, eg. CT-17 CI V level converter. Howard..K2HK Original Message Follows From: Joe Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Dx4win] Radio Control IC-756 Pro II Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:14:02 -0700 This is

[Dx4win] Howto eliminate double spots?

2004-04-26 Thread Larry Alkoff
For the past three days I have been getting double spots and double voice announcements. It's pretty annoying. Until now I have always gotten only 1 spot even when there are several sources. I've made no change in preferences. My spots come in from two streams. Two meter packet and an internet

[Dx4win] Radio Control IC-756 Pro II

2004-04-26 Thread Joe Young
Thanks to Jim, N7US, all is working fine now. Results: Radio adx 64h, 19200 baud, RTS high, 8/N/1 --- This is for Icom 756 Pro II users: My FT-1000MP is in for repairs. In the meantime I am setting up an IC-756 Pro II as a replacement. In

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Floyd Sense)
If you use DX4WIN for tracking DXCC totals, I wonder how you handle this situation: A DX station (new country) was worked in 1973 on 40M CW. The station is credited by ARRL for the mixed DXCC, but not CW DXCC as the cutoff for CW DXCC is 1975. So the question is: how to mark the QSO so that

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread Dave Mayor
Floyd; I have been a Ham since 1953 and have a LOT of pre 1975 cards. I have complained about this problem before and I guess there isn't enough interest in fixing this (it would take a couple of lines of code to fix) The way I get around this problem to create a group for all cw QSO after the

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Dunlap)
Down at the bottom of the QSO window (you may have to hit F5 multiple times to expand the window) are the award settings for that QSO. Set the mixed DXCC to Chkd and the mode to --. I think that should do what you want. 73 de Terry KK6T Original Message From: Floyd

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
--- Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Down at the bottom of the QSO window (you may have to hit F5 multiple times to expand the window) are the award settings for that QSO. Set the mixed DXCC to Chkd and the mode to --. I think that should do what you want. Terry, that won't do it. --

[Dx4win] QSL databases

2004-04-26 Thread John DeRuiter
I am thinking of purchasing a qsl database like Buckmaster Hamcall or Flying Horse Callbook. I see that some logging programs interface with Buckmaster via the internet instead of having to buy a CDrom. Does DX4Win do this or does it need the CDROM? Also, does anyone have any feedback on if

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Floyd Sense)
Nope. The listing will still show the CW QSO as confirmed. I want it to show as unworked. K8AC - Original Message - From: Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Floyd Sense [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] CW DXCC

[Dx4win] CW DXCC dilemma

2004-04-26 Thread Wendell Wyly - W5FL
I also asked about this several years ago; however, it really did not turn out to be much of a problem. Initially, I selected the valid qso's for submittal. The very few that were left were then simply marked as invalid and in the notes as invalid for CW DXCC. My cw qso's went back to 1955 and

[Dx4win] Power levels?

2004-04-26 Thread Rick Graham
Hi all, Has anyone tested the various power levels to see what they actually are? I know that 'H' is full power (100W) and 'L' is qrp (5W). Are the other ones just an interpolation or do they have set levels? The documentation doesn't really specify this. 73 DE AI3W, Rick --- StripMime

[Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle

2004-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Dunlap)
OK, that will definitely not work my way. Seems like groups are your only choice. But then that precludes you from using groups to separate contest Qsright? 73 de Terry KK6T Original Message From: Pete Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED],