[Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle
And how to you select a range of groups? - Original Message - From: Dick Flanagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Pete Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:55 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle At 11:05 AM 4/26/2004, Terry Dunlap wrote: OK, that will definitely not work my way. Seems like groups are your only choice. But then that precludes you from using groups to separate contest Qsright? Not necessarily. I had used groups 1-45 when I changed my call sign. I now use group 50 as my default group (instead of 0) and new groups I assign will all be above 50. So groups less than 50 are my old call, 50 or higher are my new call. 74, Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
[Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle
At 09:07 AM 4/27/2004, Mel Martin wrote: And how to you select a range of groups? Sorry. I missed the concurrent requirement. 73, Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC NV SM E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle
I am interested in this also as I keep separate lists for DXCC for my stateside ops and my portable DU ops. I have separate DX awards and DXCC for each location (as required by ARRL and CQ-WPX awards as these are two different countries) Mel Martin wrote: Right... It's probably overdue that Paul add an Operator field that could be used for this instead of groups... It's important for LotW... - Original Message - From: Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pete Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 14:05 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle OK, that will definitely not work my way. Seems like groups are your only choice. But then that precludes you from using groups to separate contest Qsright? 73 de Terry KK6T Original Message From: Pete Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Terry Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, Apr-23-2004 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle At 07:51 PM 4/23/04, Terry Dunlap wrote: What is the advantage of using groups versus just selections? I have all three of my calls set up as selections with the appropriate date ranges listed and date filter checked. I can look at All QSOs together or pick any of the callsigns to see that log/stats separately. I've done the same thing for my different QTHs. I guess my problem is that my calls are running concurrently -- though one is a club call, to be totally literal about it. Groups look like the best answer. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database is back, at www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm ___ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win ___ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win -- __ Alan Zack Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Quality Engineer, The Boeing Company, Retired Aviation Chief Warrant Officer, U.S. Coast Guard, Retired U.S. Coast Guard, Always Ready, Always There Every hour, Every day, Around the Clock and Around the World SEMPER PARATUS http://www.gocoastguard.com/
[Dx4win] Two calls - best way to handle
I just tried printing a QSL label using a group to designate QSOs made using my alternate call, and I'm confused. I named group 1 Operating as W8QZR and labeled one of my QSOs with that group no. Then I put %% in the first greeting line in the Rep/Lab tab in Preferences; according to the help file, that should print the group name. Then I go to print a label and in the preview function the %% appears on the label rather than Operating as W8QZR. I must be doing something wrong. Can anyone straighten me out? 73, Pete N4ZR
[Dx4win] 'nother question
Ok guys, I'm still entering my logs in from 1980 and I have run across many CW contacts RST reports that are like 588C (C for chirp incase you new 'uns didn't know that). How do you handle this in DX4WIN? 73 De AI3W, Rick --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
[Dx4win] 'nother question
Agree, however (as all old time tube radio ops know) that the 'C' was an integral part of the signal and was an indication that hey, I better check that out. Even if I could put '57C', but Nope. Just trying to keep the report where it logically should be. 73 De AI3W, Rick -Original Message- From: Mel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:01 PM To: 'Rick Graham'; Dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: RE: [Dx4win] 'nother question Put Chirp in notes perhaps... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Graham Sent: April 27, 2004 21:04 To: Dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Dx4win] 'nother question Ok guys, I'm still entering my logs in from 1980 and I have run across many CW contacts RST reports that are like 588C (C for chirp incase you new 'uns didn't know that). How do you handle this in DX4WIN? 73 De AI3W, Rick --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html --- ___ Dx4win mailing list Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
