Re: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug? RESOLVED
Thanks to Mike, he pointed out a reason by a private message. There was an issue under File > Awards > WAZ.. Valid Modes For all the other awards all the various modes were selected, but for WAZ there were only a few selected but crucially **NOT** MFSK so selecting that mode has corrected the situation. I don't ever remember being in this part of the settings so I don't know why the WAZ modes were different from all the other ones. Thanks Mike... It is nice to know that I have two less (tricky from EU) zones to work than I thought I needed, getting close to 7 band WAZ on the FT Digi modes Happy days! 73, Dave G3UEG On 31/01/2023 11:16, David Gould wrote: Hi Mike. Thanks for the information. I have now found another similar example on 15m Zone 32 an MFSK/FT4 qso is not being picked up by the WAZ report. I can confirm that both the MFSK/FT4 qsos have been confirmed by LoTW and both have the Zone in the qso record. 73, Dave G3UEG On 31/01/2023 11:02, Mike Cizek W0VTT wrote: Hello Dave, Something similar happened to me a few years back. The QSO was confirmed via LoTW, but the VK6 (I forget his call) did not have his zone info in his station location so LoTW, and hence dx4win, did not count it as a confirmation for zone 29. 73, Mike Cizek W0VTT -Original Message- From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of David Gould Sent: Tuesday, 31 January, 2023 04:54 To: DX4WIN Reflector Subject: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug? Version 9.0.9.1259 I have been using FT8 for a while, however recently, I have started using FT4 more often. I am chasing WAS and WAZ. I am seeing an anomaly on the WAZ report which is showing I need Zone 2 and Zone 31 on 12m. However, when I import my log file into JT Alert it is showing I only need Zone 31. When I look at my log entries for 12m Zone 2, it shows I have a worked and confirmed station for mode FT4. (MFSK/FT4) This does not seem to be being picked up by the WAZ report? In the report generator I am selecting WAZ / Listing / DIG / 12m I can provide screen shots if required. Am I missing something or is this a bug? I can't see how to positively search for other anomalies, (does it affect other reports?) but I will keep my eye open to check where I can. 73, Dave G3UEG __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug?
Hi Mike. Thanks for the information. I have now found another similar example on 15m Zone 32 an MFSK/FT4 qso is not being picked up by the WAZ report. I can confirm that both the MFSK/FT4 qsos have been confirmed by LoTW and both have the Zone in the qso record. 73, Dave G3UEG On 31/01/2023 11:02, Mike Cizek W0VTT wrote: Hello Dave, Something similar happened to me a few years back. The QSO was confirmed via LoTW, but the VK6 (I forget his call) did not have his zone info in his station location so LoTW, and hence dx4win, did not count it as a confirmation for zone 29. 73, Mike Cizek W0VTT -Original Message- From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of David Gould Sent: Tuesday, 31 January, 2023 04:54 To: DX4WIN Reflector Subject: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug? Version 9.0.9.1259 I have been using FT8 for a while, however recently, I have started using FT4 more often. I am chasing WAS and WAZ. I am seeing an anomaly on the WAZ report which is showing I need Zone 2 and Zone 31 on 12m. However, when I import my log file into JT Alert it is showing I only need Zone 31. When I look at my log entries for 12m Zone 2, it shows I have a worked and confirmed station for mode FT4. (MFSK/FT4) This does not seem to be being picked up by the WAZ report? In the report generator I am selecting WAZ / Listing / DIG / 12m I can provide screen shots if required. Am I missing something or is this a bug? I can't see how to positively search for other anomalies, (does it affect other reports?) but I will keep my eye open to check where I can. 73, Dave G3UEG __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug?
Hello Dave, Something similar happened to me a few years back. The QSO was confirmed via LoTW, but the VK6 (I forget his call) did not have his zone info in his station location so LoTW, and hence dx4win, did not count it as a confirmation for zone 29. 73, Mike Cizek W0VTT -Original Message- From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of David Gould Sent: Tuesday, 31 January, 2023 04:54 To: DX4WIN Reflector Subject: [Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug? Version 9.0.9.1259 I have been using FT8 for a while, however recently, I have started using FT4 more often. I am chasing WAS and WAZ. I am seeing an anomaly on the WAZ report which is showing I need Zone 2 and Zone 31 on 12m. However, when I import my log file into JT Alert it is showing I only need Zone 31. When I look at my log entries for 12m Zone 2, it shows I have a worked and confirmed station for mode FT4. (MFSK/FT4) This does not seem to be being picked up by the WAZ report? In the report generator I am selecting WAZ / Listing / DIG / 12m I can provide screen shots if required. Am I missing something or is this a bug? I can't see how to positively search for other anomalies, (does it affect other reports?) but I will keep my eye open to check where I can. 73, Dave G3UEG __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Dx4win] My misunderstanding or a bug?
Version 9.0.9.1259 I have been using FT8 for a while, however recently, I have started using FT4 more often. I am chasing WAS and WAZ. I am seeing an anomaly on the WAZ report which is showing I need Zone 2 and Zone 31 on 12m. However, when I import my log file into JT Alert it is showing I only need Zone 31. When I look at my log entries for 12m Zone 2, it shows I have a worked and confirmed station for mode FT4. (MFSK/FT4) This does not seem to be being picked up by the WAZ report? In the report generator I am selecting WAZ / Listing / DIG / 12m I can provide screen shots if required. Am I missing something or is this a bug? I can't see how to positively search for other anomalies, (does it affect other reports?) but I will keep my eye open to check where I can. 73, Dave G3UEG __ DX4WIN mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
