At 03:46 PM 12/7/2002 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:
The 775 doesn't have the infamous transceive switch, does it? Either in
hardware or software? Once upon a time this switch had to be set one way
or the other to communicate with the computer. sorry, don't remember any
more details, because I've
list...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C
Sent: December 10, 2002 8:17 PM
To: Pete Smith; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] IC775DSP/CT-17 vs DX4WIN
At 03:46 PM 12/7/2002 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:
The 775 doesn't
I have problem to get my IC775 and CT17 work with DX4WIN.
It always say Radio timeout.
I have done the proper setup in DX4WIN.
-address for IC775 is 46
-Baudrate is 1200
-The baudrate in my computer is also set to 1200.
I have tested with several computers, I have also reload DX4WIN several=20
11:36 AM
Subject: [Dx4win] IC775DSP/CT-17 vs DX4WIN
I have problem to get my IC775 and CT17 work with DX4WIN.
It always say Radio timeout.
I have done the proper setup in DX4WIN.
-address for IC775 is 46
-Baudrate is 1200
-The baudrate in my computer is also set to 1200.
I have tested with several
]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] IC775DSP/CT-17 vs DX4WIN
Ben-
I used to have that same setup and it worked fine. Try seeing the radio
and program to 9600 baud and I have some vague memory the radio address
is 4C or 5C, not 46.
Andy K5VM
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
The 775 doesn't have the infamous transceive switch, does it? Either in
hardware or software? Once upon a time this switch had to be set one way
or the other to communicate with the computer. sorry, don't remember any
more details, because I've never owned an Icom HF rig.
73, Pete N4ZR
6 matches
Mail list logo
