Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Mindless rant...

2001-05-21 Thread Richard Bennett
Ha, ha that's good! - Original Message - From: Michael Pemberton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May, 2001 04:20 Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Mindless rant... need I say more? Digital Strider wrote: Anyone else the damn "Sock the Monkey" banner-ad n

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Richard Bennett
Hi, That's great, now a few on the Mac, and we know where we are. Have you tried to apply the (maybe) patch I posted at sourceforge? This should stop al those mouse.js line 128 errors. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=425303&group_id=575 7&atid=105757 It should also help

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Richard Bennett
  Dynimage doesn't use load but img.complete,  which always returns true, so DynImage.onLoading=function() {} doesn't do anything. This should be using .onload - I don't know why this has to be captured, as far as I know the only browser not to work properly with onload was an obscure versio

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Order of execution of .js files

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
this is almost the same as what I have. my applet downloads the code.  since java automtically does not return until the code has finished downloading and executing, there are no problems with syncronization. my applet / js code combines and wraps the downloaded code in a new javascript function.

[Dynapi-Dev] Order of execution of .js files

2001-05-21 Thread Daniel LaLiberte
Joachim Lundgren writes: ... > Imagine a file A.js that requires B.js and checks if the file already > has been loaded else loads it (with writing a SCRIPT tag) the > required file (B.js) is loaded _after_ the current JavaScript-block > or file has been executed - not inserted instead of the S

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Mindless rant...

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
need I say more? Digital Strider wrote: Anyone else the damn "Sock the Monkey" banner-ad needs to be banned (in all forms) from the Internet? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.252 / Virus Database: 125 - Release Dat

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
Cameron Hart wrote: Michael Pemberton wrote: > I think we need to look more closely at how the loadpanel is coded. >  - this is the only object / widget that uses the onload event.  as such it > should be placed here instead of in the dynlayer. I'm not sure what you mean? LoadPanel invokes a load

[Dynapi-Dev] [ dynapi-Bugs-426121 ] NS6 Visibility Issue

2001-05-21 Thread noreply
Bugs item #426121, was updated on 2001-05-21 16:33 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105757&aid=426121&group_id=5757 Category: DynAPI 2 Browser-Specific Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robbie Ramirez (robbie79) Assig

[Dynapi-Dev] Re: Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Robelix
I tested the latest CVS snapshot with Linux: NS 4.76 (rpm from Red Hat update server), Linux kernel 2.4.2, Xfree 4.03 dynapi.api.delete: layers are not removed when deleting, but they are moved at other position when creating a new one. dynapi.event.dragevent: syntax error in dynapi.e

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Cameron Hart
Michael Pemberton wrote: > I think we need to look more closely at how the loadpanel is coded. > - this is the only object / widget that uses the onload event. as such it > should be placed here instead of in the dynlayer. I'm not sure what you mean? LoadPanel invokes a load event. Whether

RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Mindless rant...

2001-05-21 Thread Nathan Cassano
Thats why the good Lord made the JunkBuster proxy server. http://www.junkbusters.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Digital Strider Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Mindless rant... Anyone

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Latest snapshot bugreport

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
I think we need to look more closely at how the loadpanel is coded. - this is the only object / widget that uses the onload event. as such it should be placed here instead of in the dynlayer. - mouse events are released by this widget when it loads a file. WHY? Cameron Hart wrote: > > * dyna

[Dynapi-Dev] [ dynapi-Patches-425954 ] extended OS and browser-detection

2001-05-21 Thread noreply
Patches item #425954, was updated on 2001-05-21 08:59 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305757&aid=425954&group_id=5757 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Ano

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Development Direction

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
but doesn't that mean that we then go back to where we were before the dynapi. we are back to being at the mercy of the browser. i personally use the dynapi to make the browser behave in a standard manner. there are too many differences between the method of event control between the browsers to

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Simple question...

2001-05-21 Thread Michael Pemberton
With my applet base loading. I can load the content in the same fashion but can actually delay the loading of widget code until it is actually needed. eg. I can have a widget that has the option of using the mouse code for stopping mouse events. the mouse code is not download unless I have sele