n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] My Latest
>
> > this can be dome with:
> > button1.onClick=button2.onClick=button3.onClick=function() { ... };
> >
> > this
t; Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] My Latest
>
>
> > this can be dome with:
> > button1.onClick=button2.onClick=button3.onClick=function() { ... };
> >
> > this is actually more economical than listeners.
> >
> > Rich
Ah yes,
Why do eventlisteners get the preference then?
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] My Latest
> this can be dome with:
> but
this can be dome with:
button1.onClick=button2.onClick=button3.onClick=function() { ... };
this is actually more economical than listeners.
Richard Bennett wrote:
> although if you have a lot of layers with a click event, it would be more
> economical to use one event listener for all of th
gsfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dynapi-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:42 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] My Latest
> Well first of all since the DynAPI development (mainly pascal) started
> working more in my way and I agreed on some matter wit
Well first of all since the DynAPI development (mainly pascal) started
working more in my way and I agreed on some matter with pascal there is no
need for Canvas.
On the other hand I do like my way of handling events so I created a file
called simpleevents.js that lets you use the regular DynAPI e
