erson to be in charge of the ultimate
destiny of DynAPI. After all the reason that DynAPI moved to sourceforge was
because you were to busy to maintain the original DynAPI. Please explain
your intent with the 2.6 core.
Regards,
Laszlo Teglas
Original Message Follows
From: Dan Stein
BSD means...?
How different is it from GNU?
Original Message Follows
From: Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] New DynAPI Stuff - Documentation
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:19:59 -0500
I've attached my document explaining all the n
BSD means...?
How different is it from GNU?
Original Message Follows
From: Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] New DynAPI Stuff - Documentation
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:19:59 -0500
I've attached my document explaining all the n
--- Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW - what's gonna be the version number? 2.6? 2.7?
> 3.0?
>
I vote for 3.0 all the way!
Reason: This release (3.0) includes major changes to
the DynAPI structure therefore a move to 3.0 verion
number will make a clear distinction between the
oth
I've attached my document explaining all the new features of DynAPI. It should give
everybody a clear explanation of what to change in their code to make it compliant.
It might take a while until I can get the rework of the events complete, so I'd be a
go for getting this codebase as-is into t
I've been messing with Dan's new dynapi code and have made a few minor updates. Dan
posted a
url to his new code base a while back. I thought I would attach it so people could
start looking at
how the new structure will be. This will give widget developers a chance to begin
working on the
