On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 21:24, Raymond Irving wrote:
> Ok, the majority is for the common-base solution. I'll
> work on this and create a dynlayer_common.js and a
> mouse_common.js file.
>
> IMO only the above two groups should require common
> base solutions.
>
> As for the overwriting of function
Ok, the majority is for the common-base solution. I'll
work on this and create a dynlayer_common.js and a
mouse_common.js file.
IMO only the above two groups should require common
base solutions.
As for the overwriting of functions that are browser
specific, I would suggested that we branch the
I agree with Doug's idea below, though Raymond mentioned:
> 3) The library class
> currently does not support common-base files (but this
> can be added).
I'm not sure? Are dynapi.api.* common files and then we
add dynapi.api.ext.whatever for an extension. The dynapi
pseudo-library system is clev
I hate these replay to all things
I agree with everything he said.
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 21:20, Doug Melvin wrote:
> > Let's hear the views of the other developers:
> >
> > 1) Should we implement a common-base file system for
> > dynlayers?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> > 2) Do you think it will be easier to
> Let's hear the views of the other developers:
>
> 1) Should we implement a common-base file system for
> dynlayers?
Yes.
> 2) Do you think it will be easier to maintain a
> common-base dynlayer file?
Yes.
Clarification. While having to export a function once you have a browser
specific fix i
> To: "Dynapi-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] New functions for DynLayer
>
>
> >
> > --- Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I prefer extending DynLayer in one file only.
> >
--- Benoit Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think these should be added to dynlayer main
> files. There's something
> inconvenient with the split of all the dynlayer
> files for different
> browsers. There's no common file for apis that don't
> have anything
> browser related but rely on
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] New functions for DynLayer
>
> --- Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I prefer extending DynLayer in one file only.
>
> So are you for the DynLayerXtension library?
>
> > Wi
--- Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer extending DynLayer in one file only.
So are you for the DynLayerXtension library?
> Will setFocus raise z-index on a layer to be the
> highest?
> Or did you mean something else?
Yes, it will place the layer as the top but it also
does a few other
I think these should be added to dynlayer main files. There's something inconvenient with the split of all the dynlayer files for different browsers. There's no common file for apis that don't have anything browser related but rely on existing dynapi api, which I guess is the case for something lik
Raymond Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Some time ago I started creating a new type of Layer
> that would improved on DynLayer's features, but now
> I've scrapped that idea to just fully support and
> improve DynLayer as a low level layer for the api.
> Below you'll find a
Hello Everyone,
Some time ago I started creating a new type of Layer
that would improved on DynLayer's features, but now
I've scrapped that idea to just fully support and
improve DynLayer as a low level layer for the api.
Below you'll find a few functions I had in mind.
I'm wondering if I should
12 matches
Mail list logo
