RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project

2001-11-16 Thread Laszlo Teglas
ded tweaking later? NanoFace =;^) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Bennett Sent: November 15, 2001 6:58 PM To: Matt Fair; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project Hi, Of course you can do this, but this

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project

2001-11-15 Thread Richard Bennett
ED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:30 PM Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project > Hello, > I think we should have the comments be parsed out for the > documentation. This will simplify documenting and allow the documents > be most up to date. When you seper

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project

2001-11-15 Thread Matt Fair
I looked on sourceforge and right now they have a project called jsdoc that is written in perl. We could create a project with another name however. Matt On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 16:30, Matt Fair wrote: > Hello, > I think we should have the comments be parsed out for the > documentation. This will

[Dynapi-Dev] Re: Documentation Project

2001-11-15 Thread Matt Fair
Hello, I think we should have the comments be parsed out for the documentation. This will simplify documenting and allow the documents be most up to date. When you seperate your code and documentation, they will eventually (like how it is now) become different unless you are really on top of it.