Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic wigdet set

2003-09-14 Thread Kevin
> > Daniel > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Raymond > > Irving > > Sent: den 11 september 2003 01:36 > > To: DynAPI-Dev > > Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Stand

RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic wigdet set

2003-09-14 Thread Raymond Irving
ehalf Of Raymond > Irving > Sent: den 11 september 2003 01:36 > To: DynAPI-Dev > Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic > wigdet set > > > Hi Everyone, > > I think we need to standardize on a basic widget > format. Should we stick to the old

RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic wigdet set

2003-09-10 Thread Daniel Tiru
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Irving Sent: den 11 september 2003 01:36 To: DynAPI-Dev Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic wigdet set Hi Everyone, I think we need to standardize on a basic widget format. Should we stick to the ol

[Dynapi-Dev] Standardizing on the basic wigdet set

2003-09-10 Thread Raymond Irving
Hi Everyone, I think we need to standardize on a basic widget format. Should we stick to the old method, use a new theme-able or skin-able method or use StyleManager's approach? Need some feedback -- Raymond Irving __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, e