Re: [Dynapi-Dev] xHTML Compliance Analysis

2001-06-17 Thread Jordi Ministral
stion > of good style and uniformity. > > Richard. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stephan Tolksdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Anarchos -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 16 June, 2001 15:19 > Subject: Re: [D

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] xHTML Compliance Analysis

2001-06-17 Thread Richard Bennett
TECTED]> To: "Anarchos -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 16 June, 2001 15:19 Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] xHTML Compliance Analysis > > ey guys, I looked at DynAPI today and saw that it wasn't xHTML compliant, > > so I made a small file that do

Re: [Dynapi-Dev] xHTML Compliance Analysis

2001-06-16 Thread Stephan Tolksdorf
> ey guys, I looked at DynAPI today and saw that it wasn't xHTML compliant, > so I made a small file that documents incompatibilities with xHTML on the > 2.53 release. Nice work! I'd vote for adopting most of the changes. > xHTML Analysis of DynAPI v2.53 > Author: Anarchos > Date: 6-15-01 > E-m

[Dynapi-Dev] xHTML Compliance Analysis

2001-06-15 Thread Anarchos -
Hey guys, I looked at DynAPI today and saw that it wasn't xHTML compliant, so I made a small file that documents incompatibilities with xHTML on the 2.53 release. Word-wrapping is off for the line numbers and I did this manually so there could very well be errors in my analysis. I don't know w