<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Dynapi-Dev] note:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dougal Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrot
- Original Message -
From: "Dougal Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I think you're right there, however I tried to check this, but couldn't
> > replicate the bug this was supposed to fix.
> > Wasn't it that in IE5.5 an empty layer
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Dougal Campbell wrote:
> It has to do with SSL pages. If the DynLayer is from a page secured with
> SSL, the "url(javascript:void)" syntax caused IE5.5 to complain about
> unsecure elements in the page. I don't think mouse events were an issue
> (unless there was some older re
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
> [...]
> I think you're right there, however I tried to check this, but couldn't
> replicate the bug this was supposed to fix.
> Wasn't it that in IE5.5 an empty layer wouldn't catch mouse-events?
It has to do with SSL pages. If the DynLayer is from a
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > {background-image: none}
>
> > ...without the "url()" enclosing it.
>
> Yes, in that instance none is correct (which is how is would be done
> in css). But using url it is evaluated as an expression. The problem,
> I t
On 11/1/2001, Scott Andrew LePera wrote:
> "none" actually is a proper value, but it should be expressed this way:
> {background-image: none}
> ...without the "url()" enclosing it.
Yes, in that instance none is correct (which is how is would be done
in css). But using url it is evaluated as a
Thats not really a good idea, because none has no real value. So you
are assigning undefined as a background image. Sure it may work, but I would argue
that the real image solution is cleaner.
Rob
On 11/1/2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
> Could people running https:// please confirm this works?
>
