this.elm holds the reference to the actual element. So without it, a
dynlayer is useless. if thats the case, you should just write your
own div strings in the parent.
On 10/26/2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Hello,
>>
> this.elm holds the reference to the actual element.
Naturally.
It can be loaded at different times though, and that what makes the
difference.
If you want a fast startup, (like I do when loading a large treeview) it
seems to make sense to assign this.elm when it's needed, and not at startup.
(as
I think your taking a complex system and making it more complex.
Maybe you should change this.elm to a function (this.elm()), so that
the .elm is not loaded until called.
On 10/27/2001, Richard Bennett wrote:
>> this.elm holds the reference to the actual element.
> Naturally.
> It can be loaded
> > From: "Robert Rainwater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think your taking a complex system and making it more complex.
> Maybe you should change this.elm to a function (this.elm()), so that
> the .elm is not loaded until called.
Ha! That's just what I meant!
Now why can you explain this in three lin
Is there any reason why the new keyboard code was just return without a
value? If something is not false, then it must be true.
I have found that some browsers are confused by a null return when it is
expecting a value. I suggest that the code be changed to read as
follows:
Line 35:
