t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
I think this could work:
- All javascript would be held in an encrypted strings. This encryption
will have taken place on the server.
-
om: "Byrne, Gerald (euler:eti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
I think this could work:
- All javascript would be held in an encrypted strings. Thi
-Original Message-
From: Todd Marshall
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:45 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
Hi; On the Encryption/Decryption Password topic:
Seems to me that the "Private Key" is the pass
* Josh Chu
> I don't profess to be a RSA encryption expert by any means, but it's
> quite clear that you encrypt using a known public key, and decrypt
> using the cipher's private key.
that is not entirely correct. all public/private key schemes I've
seen (not that many, but anyway...) use a com
Like I mentioned, there may be
> workarounds for
> JC> this. But to have a pure client-side validation technique I think
> would be
> JC> difficult to do. By all means, I hope this is wrong, because it would
> be
> JC> very cool to see encryption/decryption done "securel
Behalf Of Roberto A.
Peña
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:44 PM
To: 'Dynapi-Help'
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
Well this is not the better way but it can give you an idea.
In this case your goal is to find a way where reversing the password is
impossi
-JC
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Josh Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Dynapi-Help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical jav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Dynapi-Help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> Of course i read the fucking page.
> We even use that here for secure messaging.
>
> - Original Message -
t; difficult to do. By all means, I hope this is wrong, because it would be
JC> very cool to see encryption/decryption done "securely" with javascript.
JC> --JC
JC> - Original Message -----
JC> From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JC> To: "Jos
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> I don't mean to be harsh, but did you read the link that you gave
> (http://www.orst.edu/dept/honors/makmur/ ) or were you just feeling lucky
> with google? I don't profess to
woops, you are correct.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dynapi-Help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> according to that link you s
l Message -
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Josh Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Dynapi-Help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript questio
u" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dynapi-Help"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> Again the problem , especially
Try http://projannet.port5.com/
-Original Message-
From: Jonah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Dynapi-Help
Subject: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
Would it be possible, in theory, to securely validate a password client
side
>
To: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dynapi-Help"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> Again the problem , especially with using key-based encrypt
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dynapi-Help"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
> two words:
> RSA encription.
> http://www.orst.edu/dept/honors/makmur/
>
>
two words:
RSA encription.
http://www.orst.edu/dept/honors/makmur/
- Original Message -
From: "Jonah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dynapi-Help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:31 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript quest
es it can be very easy to bypass this security system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonah
Sent: Jueves, 29 de Noviembre de 2001 01:32 p.m.
To: Dynapi-Help
Subject: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript question
Would it be possible, in the
safely
come up with something. Just make sure the people that need to know are
fully aware of such client-side limitations.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Jonah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Dynapi-Help
Subject: [Dynapi-Help] theoretical javascript qu
Would it be possible, in theory, to securely validate a password client
side?
Obviously, simple string matching would not work because the client could
view the source to find the correct password.
But I have this vague notion (my upper level math skills are very rusty):
Parsing the password up
20 matches
Mail list logo
