On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Barton Miller wrote:
Is there a reason that you're not building Dyninst with the default
(gcc) compilers?
You can still instrument binaries from any other compiler.
...
Hi Bart,
No, there probably isn't a good reason... although I had thought there
might be :)
Cheers,
Is there a reason that you're not building Dyninst with the default
(gcc) compilers?
You can still instrument binaries from any other compiler.
--bart
On 02/04/2015 03:48 AM, Mark Dixon wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Bill Williams wrote:
...
We only have official support for building with gcc
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Bill Williams wrote:
...
We only have official support for building with gcc (*nix) and MSVC
(Windows). It looks to me like we've fallen down an "if not GNU" rabbit
hole here and attempted to build with (non-existent) MSVC.
...
Hi Bill,
Thanks for that:- sorry, I hadn't rea
On 02/02/2015 06:29 AM, Mark Dixon wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to build Dyninst API 8.2.1 on a CentOS6 x86_64 machine with
the Intel compilers and am not getting very far - I'm hoping that some
kind soul will point me in the right direction.
It seems that cmake starts using windows-style compi
Hi there,
I'm trying to build Dyninst API 8.2.1 on a CentOS6 x86_64 machine with the
Intel compilers and am not getting very far - I'm hoping that some kind
soul will point me in the right direction.
It seems that cmake starts using windows-style compiler flags:
$ cmake -D BOOST_ROOT=${BOOS
