On 10/20/2015 06:57 AM, Barton Miller wrote:
We can certainly turn this into a regular release instead of a point
release.
Bill: do you want to upgrade this release? Or pull this feature out
of the point release? Or argue for another approach?
I definitely want to get the bug fixes officia
We can certainly turn this into a regular release instead of a point
release.
Bill: do you want to upgrade this release? Or pull this feature out of
the point release? Or argue for another approach?
--bart
On 10/19/2015 6:22 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 10/19/2015 02:43 PM, Bill Williams wro
I agree, we should not be making API changes in point releases. This
seems like something for
at least a 9.1 release. People expect only bugs fixes in the point
releases.
Jeff
On 10/19/2015 7:22 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 10/19/2015 02:43 PM, Bill Williams wrote:
* Shared libraries are now c
On 10/19/2015 02:43 PM, Bill Williams wrote:
> * Shared libraries are now consistent with executables: .o files are
> modules/mapped_modules, and they are contained in objects/mapped_objects.
How are dynamic library callbacks working under this? We talked about
changing this to report BPatch_obj
Got a whole stack of these that have been pending:
* Fixed bug in per-CU line information parsing that prevented line info
from being parsed in certain cases.
* Shared libraries are now consistent with executables: .o files are
modules/mapped_modules, and they are contained in objects/mapped_ob
