Customer Service? HAHAHAHAHA. When was that???
Randy
-Original Message-
From: Khurram Khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:05 PM
To: e-gold Discussion
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: DEFENSE FUND
>Khurram, seems like you should know about that pol
> It is not a fight against e-gold. It is a defense against the fact of being
> sued.
Donating to a fund that will be used against somebody/some corporation
that you have a grudge against doesn't have anything to do with it?
If this is just a defense fund for defendants of lawsuits, why single
Chris Lord-Van Voorst wrote:
>
> There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
> Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
> fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
> Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf a
> Mr Evans has categorically disputed these alleged claims and is now
> struggling to find the 10,000 dollars required to defend himself and
> his family against this heavy handed attack as a reward for the
> loyalty he displayed whilst working for e-gold.
What damages is G&SR seeking? It's not p
> There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
> Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
> fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
> Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf are meaningless, in my opinio
There are those of us on the e-gold list who don't even know who Charles
Evans is. No one has yet to explain why Evans deserves funding in his
fight against e-gold. If there's more to the story, I'd like to hear it.
Until then, any pleas on Evans' behalf are meaningless, in my opinion...
Chris
I reckon the best thing would be for Michael to convert the final
amount of gold to $$ and then send a check to Chuck.
Why make Charles fuck about with e-gold, if they;'re in a dispute?
Michael should use a non-Omnipay MM to send the $ to Charles.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-li
>Khurram, seems like you should know about that policy since you worked
>there for a while.
>
nope.. sorry I didn't know.. They only had me doing customer service.
Khurram Khan
==
2 cents worth?
http://two-cents-worth.com/?135153
___
> Only the owner of the account, from the POC email address, can request this,
> and it appears you're not the owner. BTW, this request need only go to me,
> and not the whole mailing list. Thanks.
> JMR
I'm glad that policy is in place. I, personally, don't want anybody but
myself to be able to
At 11:20 AM -0700 06/28/2001, Khurram Khan wrote:
>Would one of the e-gold employees on this list (Reid, Jim, Jay, Doug) please make the
>balance of account number 334574 public viewable.
>
No.
Only the owner of the account, from the POC email address, can request this,
and it appears you're no
Would one of the e-gold employees on this list (Reid, Jim, Jay, Doug) please make the
balance of account number 334574 public viewable.
Thank you,
Khurram Khan
==
2 cents worth?
http://two-cents-worth.com/?135153
_
Get email
: "Viking Coder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:39 PM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: DEFENSE FUND
> > A good idea. as was that of using a different issuer.
>
> Why not use OSGold? After all
> A good idea. as was that of using a different issuer.
Why not use OSGold? After all, e-gold officially doesn't like them. Their
policy on OSGold is probably what made a few of the ill will-mongers here.
It doesn't matter that they are an ether gold, or that they will
officially guarantee inves
> > A list of contributors will be issued on the 1st of July and the
account
> > will be paid out to CE for his Daughters Birthday
>
> Why not turn the passphrase over to Charles instead?
A good idea. as was that of using a different issuer.
But I will consult with Charles what he wants the
> A list of contributors will be issued on the 1st of July and the account
> will be paid out to CE for his Daughters Birthday
Why not turn the passphrase over to Charles instead?
Can people request to not have their name included on the list? Not for
fear of any supposed counter-strike from
> ISL kicked in a few grams!
>
> spend to 334574 !
>
Many Thanks,
>
> >Mike,
> >
> > Lets keep this issue focused on what it was intended:
> >
> > Legal fees.
Yes you are right.
Thanks for the reminder.
Kind regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gold-today.com
---
You are curr
ISL kicked in a few grams!
spend to 334574 !
>Mike,
>
> Lets keep this issue focused on what it was intended:
>
> Legal fees.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about her birthday, correct?
Thanks,
Eric aka. Mr. Nit-picker
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: DEFENSE FUND
>
DEFENSE FUND Update.
1)The Defence Fund has been now labeled Defense Fund
Thanks to all those who have contributed so far. Keep it coming.
A list of contributors will be issued on the 1st of July and the account
will be paid out to CE for his Daughters Birthday
2) we have an interim target of
19 matches
Mail list logo
