> >>>Another Australian phrase I laugh at is "sacked" (means "fired from
> >place of employment"), that always gives me a laugh! eg "JP was
> >sacked from the ad agency for swearing at the client".
> >It sounds like a football term, to American ears.
In Australia a solicitor is an attorney,
>>>Another Australian phrase I laugh at is "sacked" (means "fired from
>place of employment"), that always gives me a laugh! eg "JP was
>sacked from the ad agency for swearing at the client".
>It sounds like a football term, to American ears.
>
>Is that the equivalent of a 'low blow' or a blow to
>>Another Australian phrase I laugh at is "sacked" (means "fired from
place of employment"), that always gives me a laugh! eg "JP was
sacked from the ad agency for swearing at the client".
It sounds like a football term, to American ears.
Is that the equivalent of a 'low blow' or a blow to the
At 10:55 AM +1100 11/15/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
>ISL can provide the technology to TGC, but our price is high. God
>knows I need that new Ferrari, so be sure to email the TGC folks and
>tell them they should be spending $$ on new games, not serving from
>Sealand! :)
I'd like both!
>>The main problem is that ISL charges a vast amount of money for such
>>technology man! :)
>
>I don't know about the others, but I'd play regularly, and pay for the
>play more, and play longer, if it were like "real" blackjack or poker
>and had my friends, especially if I could message them too!!
>> I scored big on the slots yesterday, too .. won about 10 grams. The
>> worst game is video poker -- I don't know why anyone plays video
>> poker at any casino. Perhaps I'm just useless.
>
>You're playing for 4 of a kind, which comes up about every 450 hands.
Huh. Fantastic tip, thanks!
> I scored big on the slots yesterday, too .. won about 10 grams. The
> worst game is video poker -- I don't know why anyone plays video
> poker at any casino. Perhaps I'm just useless.
You're playing for 4 of a kind, which comes up about every 450 hands.
Remember when I won a Royal Flush last
>At 07:28 AM +1100 11/15/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Where's Jim to advise us on funbonds?! Looks to my unexpert eye like
>>rort-time again ... I just bought my ten.
>>
>
>I decided to nab six,
Good one ... let's see how we do.
>on the principle that I don't like to bet against JP,
>but th
At 07:28 AM +1100 11/15/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Where's Jim to advise us on funbonds?! Looks to my unexpert eye like
>rort-time again ... I just bought my ten.
>
I decided to nab six, on the principle that I don't like to bet against JP,
but this may also conform to my theory that (perv
