You know...all this storm of controversy that started
over my posting the other day really bothered
me...even the reaction that I had. So, I decided to
check the facts.
Here are the facts...
I spent $9.90 to the OSOpps in error.
I wrote to OSGold about it...not knowing if they could
help.
In
Why does it matter? They evidently could help the lady in one way or another and they
did it.
I have heard such stories about E-Gold being able to help someone un-do an error even
though it obviously was not their problem.
But why assume that if they were in fact able to help, whether it was
Unfortunately, that story means that
OS Gold is super for specific purposes and customers.
but it also means
OS Gold is not a player as a currency.
Just last night i spent THIRTY THOUSAND dollars of gold, to a market
maker I was selling wholesale to (you know who you are, you
> > So, in other words, OSGold has proven that they are a repudiable form of
> > payment.
>
> I think you misread the note. It looked as if osgold contacted the other
> account holder and they did the refund, not osgold.
: 2001-05-23 00:03:56 638632 10005584 OSOPPS 10014478 International Money
> There's a fourth way - they could have just eaten the $10 and paid it out to
> keep a happy customer.
>
That is exactly what option number 3 is.
> > 3) Leave the original payment intact, and spend the refund from their own
> > account.
> > Viking Coder
> >
> > Worth Two Cent
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Viking Coder wrote:
>
> So, in other words, OSGold has proven that they are a repudiable form of
> payment.
I think you misread the note. It looked as if osgold contacted the other
account holder and they did the refund, not osgold.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-g
There's a fourth way - they could have just eaten the $10 and paid it out to
keep a happy customer.
- Original Message -
From: "Viking Coder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:29 PM
Subje
At 11:54 AM -0500 5/24/01, SnowDog wrote:
>With all due respect, this is another reason to suspect that they might not
>be credible. Refunding that payment is a violation of their terms of
>service, unless they got the explicit permission of the account to which the
>money was sent.
Well surely
> any way the next day I received another email message telling
> me that it would be refunded to me...
>
> This morning when I looked in my account there was the
> refund
So, in other words, OSGold has proven that they are a repudiable form of
payment.
There is only 3 ways that they could have
