> (*) Microsoft shares -- the Board sits around and decides on a whim
> what "dividend" should be paid to each share of each type of share
> that month or year
>
> (*) TGC shares - the Board (management? Jim Ray? whatever - who
> knows) sits around and decides on a whim what "dividend" should be
Ben said ..
Firstly I'd like to repeat my earlier statement (probably lost in
the storm of posts recently) that to my keen eye, the TGC offering
is actually a bigger and better version of their old 'funbonds'
scheme.
that seems very astute.
To me, the old "FunBonds", and MSFT shares, and t
Firstly I'd like to repeat my earlier statement
(probably lost in the storm of posts recently)
that to my keen eye, the TGC offering is
actually a bigger and better version of their
old 'funbonds' scheme. It is a loyalty scheme
designed to share some of their profits with
keen gamblers/inve
Tedious Hareholder:
You really need to reread my original post.
I can think of many other more enjoyable ways to waste
my time.
I didn't threaten to go to anyone to impose force on
anyone.
Then why bring up the idea that The Gold Casino and
dBourse are in the jurisdiction of the SEC? If you
don't
