I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth.
Well then I think you are wrong.
That Sir, is simply your biased opinion. As I think you are the mistaken
party. Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you work
for goldmoney by providing Cambio services.
On 6 Feb 2002, at 16:33, major bosco wrote:
Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you
work for goldmoney by providing Cambio services.
Well it is true. But I am also an e-gold market maker.
Well to solve the issue, I suggest you read article VIII B C.
Then go to your
Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you
work for goldmoney by providing Cambio services.
Well it is true. But I am also an e-gold market maker.
Indeed, I'm sure you are but that is e-gold's problem and not mine.
Well to solve the issue, I suggest you read
On 5 Feb 2002, at 16:26, Ken Griffith wrote:
http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169
Hello Ken,
I disagree with your conclusion that a goldgram is a claim on the
total gold asset hold by the Goldmoney users.
In law, there is such thing as undivided property. Someone can
have a title
--- Ken Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169
GoldMoney has not invented anything new. It has merely
assembled a permutation of the prior arts of book-entry
accounting, information networks, deposit currency, and gold
bullion storage to allow the easy
--- C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Feb 2002, at 16:26, Ken Griffith wrote:
http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169
I own a 1% undivided in a quatitity of 10
kilos of
gold. I am the owner of that quantity. Who cares in which bar
it is?
Can anyone say
The owners of an undivided property own a title not a claim.
Claude, you may be correct. The courts will have to decide.
However, regardless of whether GoldGrams represent a title or merely a
claim, the patent suit against e-gold contradicts the patent itself.
The patent claims that
I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth.
Where else do gg's exist outside of the goldmoney system? Are gg's a
PHYSICAL item? NO - they are a electronic form of a demand note backed by
bullion held in storage ar Viamat.
Goldmoney in it's current form is at odd's with their
- Original Message -
From: C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In law, there is such thing as undivided property. Someone can
have a title on part of a whole. This part does not need to be
defined in other way than saying it is x% of the whole.
The owners of an undivided
IMHO, it's obvious that goldmoney is using this bogus patent issue because
they are getting blown away by their competition in sales volume.
Shoot, if I had a patent, I'd try to protect it -- even if there was just a
chance that the judge might rule in my favor. You just can't let something
I never said they didn't have a right to try to protect it -- I simply
question the motives behind the action.
E-Gold has been in business for years -- why wait until well after goldmoney
launches to file suit?
They could have filed this suit years ago -- it obvious that they are more
JP,
You've never heard of elephant bars?
Ken
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s)
via the web and shopping cart
On 5 Feb 2002, at 22:48, major bosco wrote:
I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth.
Well then I think you are wrong.
Where else do gg's exist outside of the goldmoney system? Are gg's a
PHYSICAL item? NO -
Of course not. It is a digital information.
they are a
On 5 Feb 2002, at 17:55, Patrick Chkoreff wrote:
I've sometimes wondered how GoldMoney would settle up if they decided
to go out of business.
Well the goal is not to go out of business of course.
Obviously one way to distribute the property to the smaller account
holders would be to sell
14 matches
Mail list logo
