I guess the cat is out of the bag. > On another matter, there have also been numerous public > postings alluding to > the creation of a copycat eCTA style organization. Personally, > I think that > working within the eCTA, the existing organization, is a much > better and > positive way to go.
Why is that a better and positive way to go? For whom? Another way to go is to wait a few weeks and see whether the GDCA (Global Digital Currency Association) is a better alternative or not. If it is not, then, and only then, would going with the eCTA be "a better and positive way to go." Further, there is nothing "copycat" about the GDCA. In fact, I submit that the eCTA will be doing most of the copying once the GDCA launches. Mark my words. > The bottom line is, that we do not need another organization, The facts contradict that statement. Further, I may be incorrect, but there is usually nothing wrong with choice and competition. In fact, competition is, indeed, "a positive and better way to go." One of anything is usually bad in a market economy. Or perhaps you thought the eCTA was going to gouge the market makers with $250 annual fees forever? ;) Regards, Ragnar Chairman, GDCAonline.com editor, Planetgold.com editor, Libertyimpact.com ===== Liberty Impact! Check out this free, hard-hitting weekly newsletter about privacy, liberty, offshore banking, tax avoidance & digital currencies. http://www.libertyimpact.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
