Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e: NVM corrupted (kernel 2.6.16.y)

2009-04-24 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
Hi Jesse, Other than that I'm fine evaluating that patch in our testlab. any news on the evaluation? after checking the driver I think it's best to continously do a offline selftest, as the driver seems to use the SWSM/SWSM2 registers somewhere below there. The first interface of the dual

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e: NVM corrupted (kernel 2.6.16.y)

2009-04-24 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: Other than that I'm fine evaluating that patch in our testlab. any news on the evaluation? after checking the driver I think it's best to continously do a offline selftest, as the driver seems to use the SWSM/SWSM2 registers somewhere

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: eeprom checksum is not valid after kexec

2009-04-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:40:14PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 04/23/2009 04:41 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 04/23/2009 04:10 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza