I'm trying to setup some X520-DA2s with one copper cable and one Intel
LR SFP in each for standard PF PCI device pass through. The same systems
are working OK with virtual function pass through of 82576 ports so I
think the Xen configuration is fine. The 82599EB works correctly in
Dom0, appears
Hi
Hope that posting to mail-list is ok
We are observing kernel-panics on the linux running in SMP Virtual Machines
with emulated e1000 network adapter (82545EM controller). This panics happens
quite frequently (once per 30 minutes) on the host with 16 CPUs and 10VMs (each
has 4 virtual CPU).
if between eop = tx_ring-buffer_info[i].next_to_watch and check for DD-status
CPU is interrupted and another CPU queues send and hardware completes the send,
then we next_to_watch changes and we go inside cycle with invalid eop
with buffer_info-skb NULL. The solution is to reread eop at after
Hm, since attaches are not allowed, here is the patch as text.. And.. what is
the correct way to submit a patch? because I suspect that just copy and paste
will not work
Dmitry
if between eop = tx_ring-buffer_info[i].next_to_watch and check for
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:40:00AM -0700, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
From: Brandeburg, Jesse
[snip]
these messages are due to irqbalance moving the interrupt, combined with a
kernel bug that is not handling the per-cpu stuff correctly for the irq
I can't seem to find the patch that is relevant in
-Original Message-
From: Robert Dunkley [mailto:rob...@saq.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:22 AM
To: E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Linux NICS
Subject: [E1000-devel] 82599EB - PCI Passthrough gives Error -5
I'm trying to setup some X520-DA2s with one copper cable
○ --
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your
Under load, doing a ifconfig ethX down and up brings down the performance
of
the NIC to 1/1000th of the initial number.
Could you provide more detail about the type of traffic you were running?
After the reset is the interface operational at all - i.e. is the performance
degradation the
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Rao [mailto:s...@verisign.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:56 PM
To: Tantilov, Emil S
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Performance deterioration under load - 82599EB
Under load, doing a ifconfig ethX down and up brings down the
