Re: [E1000-devel] Return Value for the function, u32 i40e_fcoe_ctxt_eof in i40e_fcoe_ctx_eof

2015-01-26 Thread nick
Jeff, That's fine, I assumed someone else was going to fix it. Nick On 2015-01-26 12:10 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote: On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 18:20 -0500, nick wrote: I am wondering what the correct error return value is for the function stated in my message. What message? In the title you state

Re: [E1000-devel] Return Value for the function, u32 i40e_fcoe_ctxt_eof in i40e_fcoe_ctx_eof

2015-01-26 Thread Dev, Vasu
-Original Message- From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 9:10 PM To: nick; Dev, Vasu Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Return Value for the function, u32 i40e_fcoe_ctxt_eof in i40e_fcoe_ctx_eof On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 18:20 -0500,

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits

2015-01-26 Thread Vick, Matthew
On 1/23/15, 4:50 PM, Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk wrote: On Sat, Jan 24 2015, Vick, Matthew matthew.v...@intel.com wrote: Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to address this. The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an invalid

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] i40e: don't enable and init FCOE by default when do PF reset

2015-01-26 Thread Dev, Vasu
-Original Message- From: ethan zhao [mailto:ethan.z...@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 6:06 PM To: Dev, Vasu Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Ethan Zhao; Ronciak, John; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Vick, Matthew;