On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Driver does not want to keep packets in tx queue when link is lost.
> But present code only reset NIC to flush them, but does not prevent
> queuing new packets. Moreover reset sequence itself could generate
> new packets via n
> From: Konstantin Khlebnikov [mailto:khlebni...@yandex-team.ru]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:13 AM
> To: net...@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Cc: Sasha Levin ; Joseph Yasi ;
> Brown, Aaron F ; Alexander Duyck
> ; e1
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:13 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
>
> Driver does not want to keep packets in tx queue when link is lost.
> But present code only reset NIC to flush them, but does not prevent
> queuing new packets. Moreover reset sequence itself could generate
> new packets via netconso
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:13 AM Konstantin Khlebnikov <
khlebni...@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Driver does not want to keep packets in tx queue when link is lost.
> But present code only reset NIC to flush them, but does not prevent
> queuing new packets. Moreover reset sequence itself could generate
